Privatization of Higher Education

Hello friends, In my opinion when our economy is mixed where both private and government sector go together in harmony, then whats wrong in privatization in education sector? Privatization motivated many investors to establish their colleges and universities throughout the countries. It provided youth of country with many option or at least have an option.

Imagine if there were only IT's and NIT's in country is it was possible for many of us to became an engineering graduate? No, because they have limited seats and country is too big. In such scenarios private universities like LPU, amity etc provided good option. So in my view privatization is not a problem but a requirement of country.

I think it is good for education must be supported by privates but all government rules followed and all liabilities are for in Indian government.

In my pint of view.

Privatization of education does not give the god results. Because in private colleges they work for god fame for their you = institute but not for every student life.

In that also they are very following good rules and regulations but they are not like with interaction of students. For example, a dreamed university has 1000 students if it is = is soo god means as it provides high qualified education and good faculty all get a good result but many of them fail in a subject. So if the students are interested in learning and if the government provides good facilities and also concern about the result and faculty we can get the result.

But due to lack of that much investment of money government not provide more colleges if private institutions are mingled with government and with some exams give some scholarships more students also allowed to good holders.

Privatization of higher education is not a very proposal provided there is a national policy to control quality of education and fees structure adopted by the private institute. The effort to provide new orientation and thrust to the system of higher education have been mostly superficial and half hearted. For providing better employment, private institute should adopt measures. So that the degrees don't get wasted.

While India can boast of having the third largest higher education system in the world, reality is that India is facing a severe shortage of skilled human resources. The reason for such a contrasting situation is the extremely low quality of primary, secondary, and college-level education in India. A possible way-out from this situation is privatization of the education system, which is predominantly public at present.

Privatisation of higher education is necessary - as we say govt of India spending lakhs of rupees on students studying in iits and nit and inturn after pass out in aspect of huge money they provide their services to foreign companies and mainly responsible for declination of countrys economy and mainly for brain drain.

ON OTHER HAND.

Students studying in private colleges are giving their services to Indian companies at cheaper rates without any complaint and giving benefit to country economy and in private colleges there is no such such well equipped labs and professors like iits and nits, from private institutions students also go abroad and providing their services to other foreign companies but their no is less.

In my opinion, the privatization of higher education should not be allowed. It promotes discrimination in education because, in India, many students belong to poor families, and private institutions never consider this concern. Privatization promotes fraudulent activity in education, and the value of our degrees also decreases because many private colleges give degrees to non-disciplined candidates. Private institutions should be completely banned when the government improves the standing of their college as they maintain the standing of IITs. Every student would get an equal education based on their performance, and money should not be a concern. In Delhi, CM Arvind Kejriwal has changed the status of government schools and colleges. So that shows the equality in education. A private institute education is better than a government college education. In government schools, they follow the old education system and do not promote students for other sectors like sports, entrepreneurship, and start-ups. So accordingly, privatisation should be allowed in the current scenario. If the government improves the education system, then privatization must be banned in India.

When we talk about private agent in any field there focus must on surplus benefits, so its agent not much think about education reform they thing on only infrastructure base and that hamper constitutional interest, Indian ethics, standard of education. Better option is private agent work as agent of state and mostly regulation, rules and some space within school for disadvantaged societies.

Then we achieve target as well as we increase the share of GDP for social sector mostly on health and education. Every country as well as India on paper has great achievement in education but we must look on practical ground we understand we are far away. So privatization is important in some extend but not necessary.

Privatization of higher education completely will defeat the purpose of inclusivity. It is said a lot of times that Private institutes provide better quality of study or the infrastructure but does it really? Then why do people die to get into IITs and why a student studying/graduated from Chandigarh University (Private) do not get placement opportunities?

The purpose of the Private sector in higher education is only to increase the expansion of higher education to the students who score medium, or medium to low. It has nothing to do with the quality.

Privatizing the higher education sector would not solve our problem of affordability in the country. So I stand on the side of not privatizing it but making it affordable at the same time expanding it to medium-scoring students.