Nuclear War cannot be won and should not be fought

Well, as far as, war is concerned no one can win any war completely without losing anything. Even the winner also have to lose something or someone.

And as we know the nuclear power is very much destructive, if misused.

If any nuclear war will occur then I think there will be no winner or loser in nuclear war. Because everything will be destroyed.

Hello Friends!

First of all I would like to explain what is nuclear war? It is a war with nuclear power. When a nuclear bomb is deployed at some place it creates nuclear devastation through series of chain reaction that happens in nucleus of an atom.

Now as our topic is "Nuclear War cannot be won and should not be fought". So let us discuss about it.

If we will see today's world almost every country have nuclear power. And the reason for this the countries give is that it is for security of the nation. If the war is fought in future it will surely be Nuclear one because war is the game of destroy and conquer policy. During war nations forget the harm that is going to cause the human as well as animals life in future.

If take the example of Hiroshima and Nagasaki cities of Japan. There still after the almost 60 years from atom bomb deployed by America, its effect can be seen. The children take births with degenerated qualities and genetics.

Nuclear war may win the war or country but it leaves a country and place not to be used again for living and also at the cost of billions of lives. This is not the win, this is the loss of humanity.

In my concern Nuclear war should not fought. In spite of using the nuclear power for destruction it must be used for growth of country because nuclear energy gives huge amount of electricity.

Now a days every developed and developing countries have the nuclear power. They used it to secure their country from the enemy countries. But there is no solution by deploying atom bombs on enemy we can solve the problem by some peaceful ways.

In my opinion nuclear war should not be fought rather we can use the power to help the human being. By using the power we can rotate direction of river so people live in desert can use water easily. It also generate much electricity. We can easily solved electricity problem in future. There are many advantages of it, so why we use it for destroy nature as well as human?

Albert Einstein once said "I don't know with what weapons WORLD WAR 3 will be fought with but I know that WORLD WAR 4 will be fought with STICKS AND STONES".

No matter who wins a nuclear war there will be nothing left for anyone after that. First the structural development will be devastated by the immediate strike followed by a nuclear winter destroying the left over life on earth.

The world is not in a condition to survive the nuclear war at the present situation as it survived the two world wars. Mahabharata is an example to all of us that could wipe out entire civilizations in days. We don't want our fate to be the same. Nukes are not answer to any solution, not even war itself.

"We are humans, think in terms of humanity, if people are there than nation or country will be there so nuclear fight must be avoid". We all know the very bad reactions of nuclear bombing.

In our world history the atomic nuclear bombs which name were little boy left on Hiroshima on 6 August, 1945 and 2nd fat boy targeted on Nagashaki on 9 August 1945 and took the life of lots of people. Around 1, 29, 000 people lost their life, get badly affected from nuclear vapor. Still now in Hiroshima, Nagashaki people are suffering from genetic disorder problem because of nuclear reaction.

"So, I think nuclear war is not option, whether there is most worst situations occurs between 2 countries but they must avoid it otherwise it will take life of lots of innocent people".

The only reason of situations that may lead to war, are the egoistic or self centred behaviour of domains with respect to each others. Nowadays similar situation is arising due to bulk crude oil present in countries like Syria where dictatorship is prominently known. Super powers are attracted to this huge storage which is nothing but million dollars for them. They are looking for the ways to get possession on that area which local dictators can never digest. Similarly others countries are also in ambush for the same. These kind of greedy thoughts are the reasons for cause of war. Only way to reduce tendency of futuristic wars is peace agreements between domains.

We need nuclear weapons. They have managed to stop full-scale wars. Besides, if we get rid of these nukes, how will we dispose of them?

In my point of view, nuclear war will create huge disaster to the countries. We already know the effect of nuclear bombs in our history example is Hiroshima and Nagasaki both are affected and most of the innocent people lost their lives. Our economy also decreases in using these nuclear weapons instead of spending for this war this money we can use it for other developments.

We are human so humanity should be present in ourselves so how can we fight with one another how can we learn with such a deadliest weapon we can also learn from history of Nagasaki and Hiroshima how innocent people died due to deadliest effect of nuclear bomb as we know that nuclear reaction never stops it is persisting and as a result we can also see in Nagasaki and Hiroshima children are not healthy and possess some kind of in compliance as deaf dumb or any other we can also use this money for development purpose why have to use it in making disastrous bomb.

It should be thankful to say something about this. Ok let see we are not going to support this war now, then what will loss of ourselves. Nothing. Then we must say due to something not happening something will surely happen in future. It is true we are not doing experiment our future will do this. And there is the possibility that they may live awesome life than us. Last thing if there is the option of better why don't we chose that.