Nuclear War cannot be won and should not be fought

Every country wants to defend against any external aggression. If enemy having lots of nuclear weapons then we must prepare our weapons so as there will be a threat in enemy's mind and war will be avoided. We have seen catastrophic effects in Hiroshima and Nagasaki during world war 1 also in Iran Iraq war. So there is no use of war after the war also there is discussion and matter is solved so why not initially only solve the matter. Now the world is worrying on North Koreas missile so we should work on anti-missile research.

Nuclear power is a boon as well as bane, but I personally think that if human beings are aware of their life's so they should avoid and restrict the nuclear power in negative sense as much as they can. On the topic of nuclear war I think it should be strictly prohibited by us.

The only reason of situations that may lead to war, are the egoistic or self centred behaviour of domains with respect to each others. Nowadays similar situation is arising due to bulk crude oil present in countries like Syria where dictatorship is prominently known. Super powers are attracted to this huge storage which is nothing but million dollars for them. They are looking for the ways to get possession on that area which local dictators can never digest. Similarly others countries are also in ambush for the same. These kind of greedy thoughts are the reasons for cause of war. Only way to reduce tendency of futuristic wars is peace agreements between domains.

To celebrate the winning one must live first.after nuclear war countries will have more casualties than wid non nuclear war.usage of nuclear is banned under UNSC regulations.i think it is one of the most important taken by UN to maintain peace.WHAT happen in hiroshiman and nagasaki was very unfortunate and even now they have to pay the effects of radiations.so in brief it just destroy the current and coming generation

I disagree with the every poster here. With the way in which our population is touching unprecedented levels, only a full blown nuclear exchange with a rival can save this country from utter catastrophe.How else could we feed, clothe and employ all those beings? Bitter it may be, but that's the truth.

In Ken Josephs letter America should use every weapon at our disposal(May 26), he never once mentioned that using nuclear weapons to solve our problems in the world today very likely would force our enemies to retaliate with their own nuclear weapons.

The civilized world has not used nuclear weapons since we bombed Japan in 1945. The world is aware that we could have no winners in a nuclear war. America continues to use conventional weapons to fight our wars because a counter-attack would kill thousands of our citizens.

Josephs also mentions the thousand of civilians we killed when we fire-bombed Germany and dropped atomic bombs on Japan at the end of World War 11.

When reading his statements concerning civilian deaths, my dearly departed mother came to mind. She was the most apolitical person I ever knew. Her main goals in life revolved around being a old-fashioned housewife. Even if she knew Adolf Hitler was hungry, she would prepare a meal for him. Her altruism was purely nonracial and nonpolitical.

I feel strongly that so many like her yet exist in today's world. The killing of "the innocents should not be in any nation's overall war plan. The politicians who cause wars were never an issue with my mother. If someone was in need, she would come to their aid. I visualize a great many Muslim women, dressed in their burkas, as reincarnations of my mother.

Well, as of now all countries are nuclear in reference to war. Countries will never be independent as they rely on each other for various things, so a nuclear war will not only be a loss for the countries fighting the war but a loss for all the countries of the world. That is why there will never be a nuclear war.

I don't think that a 3rd world war in the truest sense of the term will ever take place. As with the rise of terrorism and growing discontent among religious and ethnic groups wars have assumed a more "local" character. Large-scale wars have increased post Second World war but the risk of a nuclear stand-off is highly unlikely given the overwhelmingly destructive power of the nuclear tool, attracting widespread international repercussion that would obviously not go well with the image of the country using it. Which means that victory can be ensured in tangible terms but that would be eventually overshadowed and subdued by the human rights crises in the international scenario. So the best possible way of mending relations seem to be "dialogue" in the present globally economically interdependent world.

So even if nations are inclined to build up their nuclear capabilities I would say that just let them build their nukes because the more the countries go nuclear the lesser are the chances of having a nuclear warfare in the near future.

Now a days, all the Nations are rapidly developing. All countries facing common problem that is Nuclear war. The nucler war affected all human beings are so much, it should be injuries to future human beings.So, we have good thing in nucler deals that is produce eletricity from that. So, my request to all is take good from Bad. So, all countries can solve their problems with discuss to each others.

"Discussion can solve the problem but Nuclear war can not solve the problem". All people want peace.

War is not the solution. But sometimes situation are too bad and that's why War occurs but if we use Nuclear Bomb, It become a big cause of Humanity loss. And war is not start in between two country peoples. So why should we kill each others.

Every time in every war as King Ashoka in Kalinga battle thousand of peoples are killed so we have to be understand the loss from our history, our past experience.

So please say "No" to the wars. Specially Nuclear war.