Nuclear War cannot be won and should not be fought

Science has discovered many things which we are using for our benefits, nuclear is one among them as we know very well every thing has a pros n cons so the nuclear has the same, it depends on the human being how they use, once nuclear bomb was blasted in the lands of Hiroshima and Nagasaki the effect of those bomb we can see till date, the new born infants are abnormal, n also it has effected the land, the land can't be used for cultivation.

If something which effecting the society so much then why to invent such thing. I think the united government body should take necessary action to ban all such things not just in one country but around the globe. They should take severe action on the country who doesn't follow it though we can make power (electricity) out of it but we don't want a power out of death. Eradicate it completely no matter what we loose. No nuclear deal nothing.

Yes, I agree with this statement. Nuclear war can help the countries to win the war but the heart of people cannot win by any type of war.

According to the relation between Indo-Pak, there might be chances for nuclear war. It can affect both countries. Most of the loss of life of innocent people will face. Pakistan does not have a proper nuclear weapon. They are only dependent on nuclear missiles which can launch from land. They do not have nuclear submarines and aircraft. But on another side, India have nuclear missiles launchpad on land along with aircraft and submarine. Pakistan will definitely face a big loss of life, if there will be a nuclear war between India and Pakistan or may there will be no evidence of the physical presence of Pakistan on earth.

Guys, nuclear war is very serious matter. There is no profit of any country in the world.

Nuclear energy produces a huge amount of energy during the nuclear reaction. This energy can be used in both the ways that is in useful way or in destructive way and to choose one of the way is in the hands of human and its nature.
Useful way:it provides energy which would be used to produce electricity and will provide electricity to large extent of area(depend upon the use of electricity).
Destructive way: As we all know the power of nuclear energy so we know that how much it would be destructive as we have seen earlier during the war as on hiroshima and nagasaki.
So the use of this power should be depend upon the humanity which has to choose this beautiful earth where we live or the place where there is nothing to take care of us and this humanity.
So nuclear war should not take place in future at any cost.

"We are humans, think in terms of humanity, if people are there than nation or country will be there so nuclear fight must be avoid". We all know the very bad reactions of nuclear bombing.

In our world history the atomic nuclear bombs which name were little boy left on Hiroshima on 6 August, 1945 and 2nd fat boy targeted on Nagashaki on 9 August 1945 and took the life of lots of people. Around 1, 29, 000 people lost their life, get badly affected from nuclear vapor. Still now in Hiroshima, Nagashaki people are suffering from genetic disorder problem because of nuclear reaction.

"So, I think nuclear war is not option, whether there is most worst situations occurs between 2 countries but they must avoid it otherwise it will take life of lots of innocent people".

The sucess of nuclear deterrence may turn out to be its own undoing, Nuclear weapons helped in keeping peace between nations in the cold war era, preventing the dispute from engulfing the nations in onother catastrophic conflict. But after nearly 65years without a major war or nuclear attack many prominent scholars, statesmen and analyst have begun to take deterance for granted. They are now calling for a major drawdown of these nuclear arsenal and a commitment to pursue peace without these weapons.

Well I say to every body that getting nuclear weapons to zero is not a solution, for the very exisistence of nuclear weapons is what keeping our adverseries deterred, In addition to that our country is pursuing a policy of "no first use" to keep the tension low.

Well all of us know that today the energy producing sources are exhausting everywhere and noone needs to be told has to how important petrol and other such fuels are to the entire world. So if the governments of various country come together to generate energy rather than weapons it would first and foremost eliminate the threat that every superpower as well as the people around the globe are facing regarding nuclear war and at the same time would bring about electricity to all the areas which still are facing power crisis.

As some famous person said when asked about the outcome of the third world war, "I do not know with what kinds of weapons the Third World War will be fought, but the Fourth World War will be fought with sticks and stones"

Wars are not the solution of problems. When it will be a nuclear war, how destructive it will be you know from the result of nuclear blast at Heroshima and Nagasakhi in Japan. Having nuclear weapons, is to show that our nation is powerful but we don't know the ultimate its results. As human beings we should keep our planet healthy i.e. free from harmful radiations. Moreover nuclear energy can be used for the constructive purpose. The third world war shall be the end of life on earth. True quote by Albert Einestien:"I don't know with which weapon will the 3rd world war happen but I can surely say that 4th world war will be fought with sticks and stones. So I think this unit of showing power should be changed by saying 'NO' to nuclear weapons.

I am not against keeping the nuclear power with us. Acc to me this is the strongest thing, which shows the country power, but its utilization is the main concept. We should know how to preserve this. Its utilization can be shown by developing the power generation and minimizing the use of non-renewable resources.

But I am not in the favour of using it in the war time as its effect will not be for short time, it will last for generations and we will be the worst example to our children who spoiled their life. We all know the result of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Also a lot of technology and monetary loss occur which is not recoverable. So avoid war and use nuclear power efficiently and effectively.

Talking about the use of nuclear weapons in the past we all have seen its devastating and powerful use on Japan by America in WW2. Its effects can still be seen in today's world. As modernization of weapons has been a subject of concern for every nation the use and development of nuclear weapons have increased significantly. Now every nation has their own nuclear weapons. To defend from these nuclear weapons the USA and Russia have come up with their own ballistic missiles to tackle these problems. If nuclear war happens in near future all the continents will be submerged beneath the ocean in just a few minutes. So it's better for every nation to avoid nuclear war for a better life on earth.

67 years has passed, but people of Hiroshima and Nagasaki are still suffering from the radiation that spread after nuclear attack in second world war. Nuclear war is something which will not only have the instant catastrophic results in form of a mass genocide in fractions of seconds but it will also have a prolonged effect for many generations. First of all war should be avoided. But if War situation is there then go for traditional war methods: military, navy, army or by pressurizing the enemy country through ban and other tactics. Use of nuclear weapon may finish the war in seconds, you might win but the humanity will lose. We cannot see another Hiroshima and Nagasaki burning to ashes.