Nuclear War cannot be won and should not be fought

Group Discussion
Points to remember before you participate in this discussion:
  • Assume you are one of the members of a real group discussion.
  • Take the initiative to participate and contribute your thoughts.
  • Contribute your positive thoughts towards providing the solution.
  • Post your thoughts here.
Discussion:
89 comments Page 2 of 9.

Rahul sharma said:   8 years ago
In my opinion, nuclear weapon is a good for threaten the other country for the sake of national security but its use can bring disaster. So it should not be promoted at any cost.
(22)

Sameer said:   1 decade ago
From the beginning of the world, people always adopted only one policy i.e. "Power and Control". Today after thousand years we are still stick to this policy. War is one of example of this policy. War can never be the solution of problems whether it fought with traditional weapons or with nuclear weapons.

Am totally agree with the statement that nuclear war cannot be won and should not be fought. Because nuclear weapons can influence the every sphere of mankind more badly than any other thing. Nuclear weapons were once used in Nagasaki and Hiroshima in Japan. Worse effect of this attack is still recognize in people there. The genetics, ecological, economical, political and social effects of nuclear weapons can influences the world for long time.

At present, almost every big nation have nuclear weapons. And if war will fought between nations with nuclear weapons then it will surely prove the Gandhiji quote true i.e. "An eye for an eye makes world blind".
(21)

Akhil said:   9 years ago
Good morning guys,

According to me, yes it is true because howsoever you will win the war but never win the heart of people as many soldiers, families, houses and beautiful cities get destroyed in the war and we never reach to the solution.

What happened after USA dropped atom bomb in japan however they won the war but the people of japan still remember them and never buy any us products and gap if two countries have become more. So war cannot be won by one and should not be fought.
(20)

Amit Kumar Rai said:   1 decade ago
67 years has passed, but people of Hiroshima and Nagasaki are still suffering from the radiation that spread after nuclear attack in second world war. Nuclear war is something which will not only have the instant catastrophic results in form of a mass genocide in fractions of seconds but it will also have a prolonged effect for many generations. First of all war should be avoided. But if War situation is there then go for traditional war methods: military, navy, army or by pressurizing the enemy country through ban and other tactics. Use of nuclear weapon may finish the war in seconds, you might win but the humanity will lose. We cannot see another Hiroshima and Nagasaki burning to ashes.
(20)

Veer antil said:   1 decade ago
Now days life of every person is a struggle. We all facing many other problem like as increase of population, corruption, black marketing and question is rising that how to growth? war is not solution because if today we are in power, it is not possible that we will remain powerful always. Science and technology was made for human help but machine and technology overcome on human. We all know that nuclear war create a great disaster in the whole word. Nobody win in the war everybody loose, less or more. This statement is true that never serve sweet in the quarrel. So, why we use nuclear power in war. It is the boon of science and technology for human growth and nations development. So, there is no solution in nuclear war. I think we should be should use nuclear power for electricity power generation that's make our future life safe and easy. That will create growth in human life.
(20)

Ankush said:   1 decade ago
If nuclear war is fought I don't think there would be anyone to celebrate the win because nuclear war will cause such destruction that half of the planet will turn into ashes. Nuclear weapons have immense energy to destroy everything in their vicinity.

So if you are humanitarian than Nuclear war should be off the table.
(17)

Pankaj said:   7 years ago
Nuclear weapons are very dangerous and devastating for any country. But the other aspect of this weapon is very beneficial for mankind.

Nuclear is ultimate source of energy. Many countries are getting armed with nuclear weapons to protect their country. But if the nuclear war happen then it will swip out the population and will affect the generations and will be the loss of many species. Hence nuclear war is not an option of any problem. Problems can be solved by the interaction and war should not happen at all.
(17)

Ajit Katal said:   1 decade ago
Well, as far as, war is concerned no one can win any war completely without losing anything. Even the winner also have to lose something or someone.

And as we know the nuclear power is very much destructive, if misused.

If any nuclear war will occur then I think there will be no winner or loser in nuclear war. Because everything will be destroyed.
(17)

Shivani Rana said:   8 years ago
The nuclear weapons are just the show off of one country, it can't be used for wining it can't either be used for any good cause, it's just now we are at the edge of being destroyed so why not to destroy the other nation too, it has benefits too that if a country has nuclear weapons, the other country will think twice of attacking it or not because if they are strong enough to win over them but still the other one can destroy you either.
(16)

Tanusree said:   10 years ago
Now a days every developed and developing countries have the nuclear power. They used it to secure their country from the enemy countries. But there is no solution by deploying atom bombs on enemy we can solve the problem by some peaceful ways.

In my opinion nuclear war should not be fought rather we can use the power to help the human being. By using the power we can rotate direction of river so people live in desert can use water easily. It also generate much electricity. We can easily solved electricity problem in future. There are many advantages of it, so why we use it for destroy nature as well as human?
(16)


Post your thoughts here:

Your comments will be displayed after verification.