India should go for the presidential form of democracy

India should go for a presidential form of Government Our India is a democracy and people have to rights for vote there starting problem nowadays most of the political leaders showing their bad side before the election and force them to give a vote to their party so in this situation people have fear of lost life so they give vote unwillingly. If there would have a presidential form Govt there is less chance of corruption.

I would say a parliamentary type government should prevail in India. Unlike other countries our county is a democratic country, we have been given rights to elect the most suitable person to be a leader in respective states. So its us who can elect a more suitable person who can bring a change in our country. Election should not be biased with caste, religion or any other aspect. The chosen leader should act towards the well being of the country.

First of all.

Presidential system exists in USA (UNITED states).

Parliamentary system exists in India (Indian UNION).

Now if we compare the two geographical extents and the polity therein way back in the 18th century, the American revolution (1776-81). The revolution reflects that the people there were aware of their right to life and personal liberty (no taxation without representation) and the awareness that they can form their own government.

Even after independence they formed their 13 independent states with their own militia against the common enemy (British).

And now coming to India during this period the people of Indian geography were busy in conspiracies against each other, non awareness, 4 fold caste system, no liberal ideas no national feeling etc.

The framers of our constitution were well aware of all this; making reservation and other well framed rights and freedoms for WELFARE STATE because it wasn't among.

Concluding:

It will not be wrong to say that Indians are way behind the west the presidential/parliamentary system depends on the background. In fact presidential system is the next stage of parliamentary system.

So far so good PARLIAMENTARY AND NOT PRESIDENTIAL SYSTEM IS GOOD FOR US.

As we know India is a diverse country. It has a huge population 2nd in the world with in the small area. So one person at centre is intractable to manage the whole population. So India should for the parliamentary form of government instead of presidential form of government.

In our parliamentary form of government, we have leaders from village to state like village President, MLA's, Chief Minister. So here it is easier to complain the problems to our leaders. Yet people are facing so many issues. If India go with the Presidential form of government. There will be the chance to increase the problems.

Having MP's, MAL's help in better management particularly in the times of crisis and riots and also it is difficult to go one person every where to necessities and demands of the people.

At the end, I am going to conclude is India should go for the parliamentary form of government rather than presidential form of government.

Though India being a vast country with diverse cultures it's the people & region along with faith & self-conscious of people, race, gender & what not. It's all been reflected day in day out of our news channels.

So Presidential rule keeping the time & action is the need of hour than beating around the bush like a vast country with diverse cultures etc.

A presidential form will be more effective in our country as our polity has less power to execute because most power of a leader goes in formation of government with different parties. People do not get the right person to govern them as selection is indirect in our country. Democratic form also puts some candidates into important ministries which they are not master in. Presidential form will empower leader to choose ministers from people who excel in respective field. Here our leader will not be opposed by MPs and best brains will take care of people. Example, a scholar, researcher and experienced person from Electronics and IT will get Information and broadcasting ministry and not just a elected member having no knowledge of it.

As for as, I am concerned that at this point of time country (citizen of India) should think about that in our country more than 30 to 40 % of peoples are not aware and not getting their fundamental right fully.

One of the main reasons are the literacy even they can't take decision in their well being and they are busy in to getting to feed his family. And one more thing that we are going to make more stronger country than western I mean that it would take some time because we have P.M. The great visionary Narendra Modi. And if we talk about the decision then I would say that we should have believe in our government.

This time every developed country are looking towards our country because here we are going to become youth country. Every MNCs are looking towards to us because of our population. We have great market of every product. This is the best time to look forward for economy strengthen, growth rate of every sector which has the major important in GDP.

NOT TO EXPEND THE MONEY IN CHANGING THE DEMOCRACY. WE ARE GOING TO FORM A COUNTRY OF EPITOME FOR OTHERS.

In my view India is better with parliamentary form of democracy, if any state feels the members contesting for the president cannot yield the appropriate development, then the people of the state should be given the right to elect their own head of the state. Whereas in presidential democracy the powers of the state consulates are limited.

Hi friends,

It is necessary to have contact with people. So a single person cannot decide all the things for the benefit of our country. They must also get the opinion of the people. If we take a classroom a single person is in charge for the entire class for maintaining the class in good condition. Similarly a single person is chosen as president for maintaining the country in good condition by also consulting with public. So I prefer presidential governance is necessary.

We need democracy with stringent punishments for the convicts and fast track courts to punish them in time. If the rules are strict anyone doing wrong will be afraid of thinking of even doing wring.

Political parties must be made accountable for whatever they write in their manifestos and what they speak during campaigning to woo voters. There must be checks like we have consumer courts which made seller accountable for what he promises.

If a single person is ruling the whole country what is the guarantee that he will be working for the good of the people because power changes mind.