India should go for the presidential form of democracy

Hello, everyone.

You all have put your valuable points and I agree to that but I would like to add some key points to it.

Changing from democracy to presidential government is a good idea but with a condition that the person who is chosen as the leader should have some education qualification and can withstand any situation he faces with proper decision-making qualities.

Though India being a vast country with diverse cultures it's the people & region along with faith & self-conscious of people, race, gender & what not. It's all been reflected day in day out of our news channels.

So Presidential rule keeping the time & action is the need of hour than beating around the bush like a vast country with diverse cultures etc.

Yes, I do think that there should be a presedential form of government in India but at the same time, it is equally important that the man in power should be honest enough towards his works and decisions.

If it would be like that then I strongly believe that India will soon become a developed country. . Anyways, better than a developing country at least. The decision taken by a single mind by a good thinking and without any oppositions is always better.

Yes, it should be because the Presidential System will reforms stable government for a long term, and while taking decision its consume less time as well as the majority will be supported.

Because of Democracy, taking a decision it takes too many thoughts and reviews. It's right but decision are taken only for parties faith, not for the nation.

So, parties should be demolished and one party one rule should be established.

No, India should not go for presidential elections.

1) India is a vast country with diverse culture. It is necessary for the people from different groups to come together and form a government so that the wishes of the minority doesn't get suppressed.

2) An opposition is necessary to get the right decision implemented which is acceptable to all.

Yes, India should go for presidential elections.

1) A right person should be put to power and it will help the actions to be implemented quickly. Parliamentary form consumes a lot of time.

2) If a developed country like the USA can progress further with the power concentrated in a single hand then why not ours.

3) Today the major problem in India is the formation of a coalition government. With no party in the absolute majority, no decision can be implemented as there is constant opposition from the other.

I don't think India should go for a presidential form because you can't leave a country with full of diversity in languages, castes, religions in one hand. Since it's not necessarily being a safe hand. But obviously, some major changes must be seen in our political system. As everything in the world changes according to time. During independence, our great leaders make some rule according to that scenario that is 100% correct, but we should think of yourself with time and changes.

Yes I support the presidential form of democracy because, it is enough only if one person is good the nation will automatically develop no need of these many politicians. If a developed country is handled by the one person why not ours. If this is formed every common man will get his every right. It is required for a nation to develop swiftly.

India still is not in the position to become a single leader country as our country is diverse whether in terms language, culture, orientation, still we require the leaders who are well imbibed with the respective part of the country so these leaders will convey the message, the plight of the people or any kind of information etc. That is all running in India quite good.

So there will not be any considerations on the parliamentary form of the govt.

India still requires to be more developed in terms of Defense sector, agriculture sector etc.

Also, One of the merit of the parliamentary form of govt is that it consists both the ruling party and the opposition that will not help in running the country judiciously.

I don't think so India should go for presidential form of democracy because it is not possible with country like India as we know that India is 7th in term of land geography and 2nd in world for his population. So it's very difficult to implement it single person rule will be highly daunting task to handle 125 crore people.

I know that single rule doesn't mean one person rule there will more administrator like governor under president. But if this possible so our veteran who made our constitution they never included federal government in our constitution.