India should go for the presidential form of democracy

Guys according to me one leader is not enough to handle the whole affairs of the country. Though there is a kind of instability in the present form of government but how can we say that after all the affairs of our our country is given in the hands of that 1 person will he be able to manage the country affairs?

It is said that Democracy is of the people, for the people, by the people. The word 'people' has been replaced by the politicians. Presidential system may be an alternate to get rid off from the current facing problems. I think now the times have to be come to see some changes in current political system so there are many alternate to change the existing system but we are taking alternate as parliamentary system.

India still is not in the position to become a single leader country as our country is diverse whether in terms language, culture, orientation, still we require the leaders who are well imbibed with the respective part of the country so these leaders will convey the message, the plight of the people or any kind of information etc. That is all running in India quite good.

So there will not be any considerations on the parliamentary form of the govt.

India still requires to be more developed in terms of Defense sector, agriculture sector etc.

Also, One of the merit of the parliamentary form of govt is that it consists both the ruling party and the opposition that will not help in running the country judiciously.

I think current form of the democracy is good for india, as mentioned any of my frnd above India is very much diverged country, there should be one leader to lead them.

And moreover India has the biggest constitution and provision to change the laws according to need of time. So its time to change our minds and use the available resources in the best way.

Instead of changing the type of democracy in India, it's better that each and every individual should contribute in eradicating corruption from the system. This will require awareness among people and until and unless we will not demand for change none of the system can help solving the problem. Our constitution is the largest in the world and the best part is that there are provisions for amendments. So I'll suggest that please actively take part in the government forming policy because after all it's your own India.

Yes, it would save a lot of time and money. Reason our democracy is distributed and for this distributed democracy we require more money and time. If we follow presidential government i.e. centralized government. Automatically it will reduce expenditure on election and will save a lot of money.

No I don't support at all our nation is large and there are many states and each states has its own uniqueness whether in term of language or cultural. So it not very easy to take decision that benefits the country.

The president is the first person of the country. However the election of the president is done by assembly members. Both the prime minister and President play an important role in India. There should be the election of the president. The people of the country should have the right to choose the first person who represents their country internationally.

I am agree with you all my friends but I think we should not see others country perspective, we should create our own example being not having presidential form we can live peacefully. It's all up to us how we manage, because if we don't contribute then form will be helpful until or unless we show extra effort.

I have my favour with presidential form but in India it is not useful because at this time India has so dense populated states which can't be handled by one man with their satisfaction so for India I'll go with parliamentary form although it is not working well except their profit of the party but whatever it is not so worse as will be presidential form if it is in system.