If Winning isn't everything, why do they Keep the Score?

This is so because our previous scores keep us determined to improve for next time.

There is a thing called status which every player has to maintain.

Hey, Guys.

I would like to say something about this. Sports is not about win or loose something. All you have to do is show your passion, everyone has their own style. Never hide it.

A game is played between two nations not merely for fun but far beyond it. It depicts the whole population of the nation. Of course, winning isn't everything, recently England has lost to India but a fantastic innings was played by hammed who was injured to just delay the inevitable loss for England which was appreciated by many. That shows the spirit of players. The scores are counted because obviously, everyone can't represent a nation unless he is best the nation can send to represent. It also pushes the players to perform consistently. One more reason could be that viewers get bored if there is no competition.

I agree that winning is not everything. Fun is equally important. If one would lose then he/she would be got a message for next time and it leads to improvement so winning is not everything.

Hey, guys.

According to me,

Winning isn't everything of any game/work.

Winning isn't important if you participating.

If you win the game/work, you can motivate by you, If you lost they're your mental pressure has gone high.

It depended on you that Winning is not everything.

They keep scoring because they are participating in the game, but most of all one does not only engage to win but to observe, consider the elements that needs to be considered after a lost of a game os gain so that they can strike and place more effort into achieving their goal.

Basically, every sport is a token of enthusiasm for mankind when it comes to a point that how much enthusiastic, there needs an attribute for it which is obviously "Score". And without it, we cannot measure any sport.

Hello everyone.

Acc. to my point of view, there is two meaning of this statement, first, participation in the game and second proof for what you are participating for, if we take part in the game, it shows that there is a quality of accepting the challenge and there is a challenge in the game if we set a target (score). Yes, it is truth that winning isn't everything but if we didn't get anything after participation, it will totally useless and if there isn't any target then we keep moving and moving in the space. So if we win or loose the game doesn't matter but what you get from this, is the point.

Thank you.

Yes, we all admit that winning isn't everything but according to me scores are mandatory because whether it is cricket, hockey, badminton or something else, 1 thing is similar in all of them, they all are a "game" a play of performance, and performance can only be measured in terms of scores.

Moreover, if scores were not there it would be very difficult to know where to stop. As apart from time score is the biggest factor that fixes the end point of a game.