Government Control in Higher Education is Interfering and Not Required

The govt should have the control. Because the initiatives were taken by the govt were all success. This made an increase in literacy rate. Female literacy reduced.

If our country is becoming educated only we could be a developed one. For such a development education the govt should have control.

They help to create a common social fabric where all are respected and accepted.

I strongly believe that the interference of government is mandatory.

Hi, this is Samyuktha.

In my point of view, government rule in higher education plays a prominent role in the student's life.

The government gives so many scholarships and many subsidies to poor people.

This government is also providing the fees reassessment to the students who are coming from a poor background for the engineering education system.

Private institutions providing education based on more money, but a poor and middle life people cannot bare that money.

The main disadvantage of the government system as they are not having the proper faculty, they are attracted to the private institutions.

So I conclude that the government interfering in higher education is very useful to the poor background. So it should not be stopped.

Govt control in higher educational is not at all interfering rather it is mandatory, as the huge amount of funds required for research purposes can made available by govt.

Moreover, govt funded institutes are more preferred by students as they are cheap and also provide quality education. Various government companies also prefer govt colleges rather than visting private colleges for campus recruitment. Moreover the recognistion of government colleges is also seen across the globe, on the other hand private institutes are not known worldwide.

I think, it should be controlled & led by the government.

Most of the educational institutions which provide higher education have the support with political influence. The government should allotted specific rules to all colleges and also be monitoring with some employees but some political people wants the only aim of money to run the college not to provide the good education. Whenever government allocates specific kind of good education some of the intermediate who makes it to money. Such kind of people in the society which will be destroyed. Then only Government's educational quality comes to reach.

Good morning Everyone!

I am greatly agreed with the topic that Government should intervene in our Education system.

Because the current policies of the government are not fulfilling the students need.

The scheme of passing students with the criteria of CGPA, only deteoriates the knowledge of students.

They do whatever they want there is no proper record for the fees how much you want they apply the fees for the professional courses that are not enough actually that is wrong if I want to go for higher study so we should have to pay a large number of fees.

Which is ok for the businessman children but for the middle-class students like us is not acceptable.

The main disadvantage of the government system as they are not having the proper faculty, they are attracted to the private institutions.

Private colleges and universities are one type of business nowadays. Any students who come from poor and middle-class families how can afford huge money for their studies.

But we know that education is for all and we want every citizen of India will be educated and gov definitely wants to eradicate illiteracy, especially woman's illiteracy. Gov interference should have in higher education.

Otherwise, many brilliant students who come, from middle-class families, won't get a chance to build their careers. But I think gov should take action to develop the school level education which built the base of career.

As everyone knows that IITs, IIMs, AIMS, IISR, CSIO, CDAC, NIELIT, ISRO, BSNL and DRDO provide the best quality research environment. IISR and IIT are best known in the world. Moreover, the fee offered by government colleges is not excessively high. So, it will provide a chance for potential candidates to get good quality education.

So, in my point, whoever takes responsibility for our student life. They should contribute their life to them.

I strongly believe that the interference of government is mandatory.

Yes, Government control in higher education is interfering and not required. This is because of the current policies the government has made that you cannot fail a child till seventh std, they have removed some important topics from the syllabus in exchange for some silly topic. My question is that if the child cannot be failed till seventh std, how will he ever get the will to study, he already knows that even if he didn't study no one is going to fail him. After this difficulty arises when the child reaches higher standards, he cannot study because he knows nothing, he fails in his crucial years, and lack of quality education is being seen recently in our education system all because of the interference of the government.