Capital Punishment should be Banned or Allowed?

Hello everyone, I am Sujit. I want to speak something on this topic. CP shouldn't be banned because justice won't be achieved by the death penalty. It is a good rule by this rule no one ll go for crimes and murder etc. If there won't any punishment then many people ll involve with crime and then the percent of criminal ll increase. Not giving them the punishment they deserve ll encourage others to be a criminal. If something is making good to other peoples then it isn't bad to a thing like this.

Thanks.

Capital punishment should be given to each and every killer and rapist that also in front of the public so that there will be a threat in each and every person of death before committing crime.

According to me, it should be banned because many innocents were also killed in CP.

I think capital punishment should not be abolished. Because justice will not be achieved by death penalty. Instead it will be achieved by reforming the person and giving sufficient punishment.

In my opinion I think it shouldnot be banned because there are certain cases in which this punishment seems less than what the crime a person had done like rape, brutally torchering and murdering someone. If the person who commits these crimes then the mindset of that person is never going to change throughout his life. He it is not done and he is given life imprisonment then I don't think it will work because today's generation is full of corruption, who knows he might get bailed next day and commits the same crime again. So it's better to kill his mindset of doing these crimes and this is only possible when he will be hanged to death!

It shouldn't be banned because-.

1) It will vanish the fear from the mind of society leading to more crimes. We should think like criminals first so accordingly me as a criminal, I will have a strong urge to commit a crime and at that time the intensity of fear will be less but then also if there is no capital punishment, I will think like I don't care about life imprisonment. First of all I am not going to be caught and if I got caught then in jail I will think of various methods to break it or live happily there as I will have a lot of time to think and do.

2) We are a part of a group or society to achieve something. We are not free to harm others as a whole. A society shouldn't sacrifice due to one person if one person is affecting all the humanity then it is better to remove that particular criminal from the society. (As in case of apples).

3) We can't say that we don't have any right to kill a person and only the god has that right. Because god can never be a caption of that particular society we have a freedom to decide whether a criminal should be allowed to live or not.

4) By taking his life not only the society will get rid of him but also many who are going to do the same offence for them it will surely a scary one.

5) Capital punishment should be for severe cases only because in small crimes their is hope for criminals that they can change over a period of time. But big crimes not only show severity of crime but also severity of wrong thoughts too. And as we know involuntary action requires thinking and that thinking is not a byproduct of one day and one idea. So to break that cycle of thoughts in that criminal is a very long time process and if the criminal is not ready to change then his thoughts will die only when he is died.

6) By capital punishment we can develop a system in which whole society can understand severity of such crime and by this parents are sure to protect their children from such thoughts and actions.

I think the capital punishment must be given in rarest of rare cases i.e. when the degree of measure is same for eg if some one has brutally murdered someone and it is very much clear that he is the only criminal than it must be given, in all cases it must not be given because it can give an adverse affect on today's generation. I must say that it should not vanished from our Constitution as then it may feel to someone of bo fear of life.

What kind of double standard is that most of the people say that Capital punishment is barbaric and it should be banned. But for eg suppose if someone rapes your sister and you are the judge what punishment would you give to the culprit? 1000% people will say we'll give him death punishment, many will say I will kill people ruthlessly. But if one rapes someone's sister then you say, no capital punishment should be banned so why it's a double standard, Law should be same for all. Isn't it?

Hello,

My name is Ujjwal Chauhan and according to my view, it is a right method to punish the criminals because if we abolish capital punishment. Among common people like us have not any fear that what will be done after doing a crime. And yes it's a right method to abolish crime from the world. And I want to tell you that the criminals have not any fear that what will be after doing a crime like rape, murder, etc. So, guys don't give them another chance to do such a matter again & again even. And we have not to increase their mighty minds.

And with the capital punishment they had a fear & they will think more than 100 times before doing such a crime.

Thanks.

I would like to say capital punishment is not needed for an hour. Because who is getting capital punishments?people who involve in crime like the killing of people, terrorism, and in some serious threats. If we do the same to the person what is the difference between them and us. Also, everyone has right to live. We are not God to take their lives. In some cases, innocent people get capital punishment instead of the right criminal. What an injustice is this. In my opinion, criminals should be given life imprisonment so that they can know the meaning of life. Also, our jail and police station infrastructure should be enhanced. So that no one would escape during imprisonment. That's all I want to say. Thank you all.