Civil Engineering - Water Supply Engineering - Discussion
Discussion Forum : Water Supply Engineering - Section 2 (Q.No. 7)
7.
Disinfection of water with ozone is not good because
Discussion:
40 comments Page 2 of 4.
Mahesh said:
10 years ago
Answer will be option A definitely because ozone is a better disinfectant in compare to chlorine but it gets vanishes before reaching the supply mains.
Aamir said:
8 years ago
I also marked the option A, as in chlorination residual chlorine is left in water so as to avoid any contamination during distribution.
Faustin said:
1 decade ago
Due to the purpose of disinfection, bacteria must be removed at least 100%? Ozone kill more than chlorine so, chlorine is mostly used.
Arvind puri said:
5 years ago
Correct answer is Option A because it is less effective to convey long pipe treatmen. And lost itself before it reach consumer point.
(1)
Raza Baloch said:
1 decade ago
How can it be possible? and if possible, then why it is not good?
What is the reason behind it? someone please help me out this.
What is the reason behind it? someone please help me out this.
Sagar patil said:
9 years ago
Though ozone is efficient, it never left the residue for the water in future use that's why it is not convenient.
Ashish Tadewar said:
8 years ago
How is that possible? Is that answer for the question 'disinfection of water with ozone is good because?'.
Pradeep said:
9 years ago
This is wrong because ozone is more effective and it is expensive. So, it is used in only private pools.
Bipin said:
1 decade ago
I think answer is wrong it may be like "It is less efficient than chlorine in killing bacteria".
Sachin said:
7 years ago
Ozone treartment costly as compared to other members not suitable for big cities.
Post your comments here:
Quick links
Quantitative Aptitude
Verbal (English)
Reasoning
Programming
Interview
Placement Papers