Civil Engineering - Steel Structure Design - Discussion
Discussion Forum : Steel Structure Design - Section 1 (Q.No. 3)
3.
For determination of allowable stress in axial compression, Indian Standard Institution has adopted
Discussion:
35 comments Page 2 of 4.
Raj said:
7 years ago
IS 800 -1984 Rankine merchant formula.
Abhishek singh said:
7 years ago
Option C is correct.
Ramesh said:
7 years ago
Secant is correct. Because we get modulus of elasticity up to proportionality limit. So up to lower yield point we secant modulus of elasticity and beyond limit, we get tangent modulus. Is code all other have a modulus of a tangent.
Deven negi said:
8 years ago
Perry robertson is the correct answer.
Dharshit said:
8 years ago
Rankine merchant is correct.
Garry said:
8 years ago
I agree @ Faizan Raza Khan.
Faizan Raza Khan said:
8 years ago
1. Secant formula was used in earlier version of IS:800 prior to 1984.
2. IS:800-1984 recommended Merchant-Rankine formula.
3. IS:800-2007 recommend the Perry Roberston formula (see clause 7.1.2.1, pg no-34 of IS:800-2007).
2. IS:800-1984 recommended Merchant-Rankine formula.
3. IS:800-2007 recommend the Perry Roberston formula (see clause 7.1.2.1, pg no-34 of IS:800-2007).
Munna yadav said:
8 years ago
According to Indian standard institute perry Robertson formula & according to British standard institute Secant formula adopted.
Rockii said:
8 years ago
Perry Robertson formula according to IS CODE 800- 2007.
Ashish said:
8 years ago
Perry Robertson formula according to IS CODE 800- 2007.
Post your comments here:
Quick links
Quantitative Aptitude
Verbal (English)
Reasoning
Programming
Interview
Placement Papers