Chemical Engineering - Heat Transfer - Discussion
Discussion Forum : Heat Transfer - Section 1 (Q.No. 19)
19.
For shell and tube heat exchanger, with increasing heat transfer area, the purchased cost per unit heat transfer area
Discussion:
17 comments Page 2 of 2.
Himanshu said:
7 years ago
Please give valid explanation.
Nilesh said:
6 years ago
Please give explanation for this question.
Avinash Kumar Singh said:
6 years ago
It is about the insulation done on the bodies, as a graph of " heat loss vs radius of insulation".
(1)
Amjed Qarahgouli said:
4 years ago
In my opinion, the increase of the heat transfer area may be a high cost.
Nikhil Verma IITM said:
2 years ago
This is because the fixed costs of the equipment (such as the cost of the shell, tube sheets, and other components) are spread over a larger surface area, leading to economies of scale.
Mongam Damodhar Rao said:
2 years ago
What does it mean to pass through maxima?
Please explain.
Please explain.
Deepak said:
3 weeks ago
Why cost per unit area decreases with increasing area?
This is due to economies of scale in heat exchanger manufacturing. The purchased cost of a shell-and-tube heat exchanger does not increase linearly with area; instead, it follows a power-law relationship:
Typically, for shell-and-tube exchangers, the exponent is approximately $n approximately 0.6$ .
Cost per unit area:
Since $n-1$ is negative, the cost per unit area decreases as area $A$ increases .
Practical reason:
Fixed costs (design, fabrication setup, shells, heads) are spread over more surface area
Larger exchangers use material more efficiently (less material per unit area)
Manufacturing and installation costs don't scale linearly.
So, the correct Answer is : Option B — decreases.
This is due to economies of scale in heat exchanger manufacturing. The purchased cost of a shell-and-tube heat exchanger does not increase linearly with area; instead, it follows a power-law relationship:
Typically, for shell-and-tube exchangers, the exponent is approximately $n approximately 0.6$ .
Cost per unit area:
Since $n-1$ is negative, the cost per unit area decreases as area $A$ increases .
Practical reason:
Fixed costs (design, fabrication setup, shells, heads) are spread over more surface area
Larger exchangers use material more efficiently (less material per unit area)
Manufacturing and installation costs don't scale linearly.
So, the correct Answer is : Option B — decreases.
Post your comments here:
Quick links
Quantitative Aptitude
Verbal (English)
Reasoning
Programming
Interview
Placement Papers