C# Programming - Strings - Discussion

Discussion :: Strings - General Questions (Q.No.3)

3. 

Which of the following statements will correctly copy the contents of one string into another ?

[A].
String s1 = "String";
String s2; 
s2 = s1;
[B].
String s1 = "String" ; 
String s2;
s2 = String.Concat(s1, s2);
[C].
String s1 = "String"; 
String s2;
s2 = String.Copy(s1);
[D].
String s1 = "String"; 
String s2;
s2 = s1.Replace();
[E].
String s1 = "String"; 
String s2;
s2 = s2.StringCopy(s1);

Answer: Option C

Explanation:

No answer description available for this question.

Mark said: (May 12, 2012)  
String s1 = "String";
String s2;
s2 = String.Copy(s1);
//is the right answer!!

Vishnu said: (Nov 16, 2012)  
String s1 = "String";
String s2;
s2 = s1;
//it is also right

Neeraj said: (Jul 12, 2013)  
Mark is right. Because in s2=s1 giving the reference of s1 to s2.

Amit Gupta said: (Jul 24, 2013)  
Why not first is right?

Zeel said: (Jul 27, 2013)  
Yes exactly this is also right.

String s1 = "String";
String s2;
s2 = s1;

//It is also right.

Mahi said: (Dec 21, 2013)  
Can't find the difference.

Can anyone tell clearly.

Sami said: (Jan 4, 2014)  
When s1="string"; here a reference points to the "string". and when.

s2=s1; here s2 also points to the "string". and same is the case.

When s2 = String.Copy (s1) ;. So why 1st is not right. Can any please tell the difference?

Nichholas Mahbouby said: (May 7, 2014)  
s1 = s2 will result in 2 variables that reference the same object.

s2 = string.Copy(s1) will result in 2 variables that reference different objects containing the same value. Console.Write(object.ReferenceEquals(s1, s2)) will output "False".

Max said: (May 12, 2014)  
Desription:

Acc. to question we need to copy the contents of one string into another.

Solution:-

Option-1 : Incorrect, String s1 = "String" when executed will create a "String" object. s2 = s1 doesn't copies the content rather it passes its reference to variable s2. Only 1 Object is created both s1 and s2 referring same object.

Option-2 : Obviously Incorrect answer, Reason Strings are immutable

Option-3 : Correct, because here we are only copying the content , so in end we will have 2 objects . By value they are same but by reference they are different.

Option-4 : No overload for method 'Replace' takes '0' arguments.

Option-5 : Type 'string' does not contain a definition for 'StringCopy' and no extension method 'StringCopy' of type 'string' could be found.

Thank You :).

Vijay said: (Jul 31, 2014)  
If you refer to the first question in strings, it clearly mentions strings are immutable and CLR optimizes memory by interning same strings into one.

If Option 3 is correct, does it not defeat the above fact ?

Dheer said: (Dec 25, 2014)  
String s2, s1 = "string";

s2 = s1;
s2.equals(s1);

Nasser Amira said: (Jan 19, 2015)  
Awesome discussion. In response to @Nichholas, when you run the following the console return true actually not false.

String s1 = "String";
String s2;
s2 = s1;
Console.Write(object.ReferenceEquals(s1, s2));

Pankaj Mehta said: (Sep 15, 2015)  
Case A one references got copied.

Mean both string now got started to point same [Memory].

Case C exact data is copied in other string.

Naresh said: (Jul 16, 2016)  
Will get same object name.

String s1 = "String";
String s2;
s2 = String.Copy(s1);
Console.WriteLine(s2);
Console.WriteLine(s1);
Console.WriteLine(s1.GetHashCode());
Console.WriteLine(s2.GetHashCode());

Post your comments here:

Name *:

Email   : (optional)

» Your comments will be displayed only after manual approval.