Nuclear War cannot be won and should not be fought
|
|
|
 |
Points to remember before you participate in this disuccsion:
- Assume, you one of the member of a real group discussion.
- Take the initiative to participate and contribute your thoughts.
- Express your positive attitude towards providing the solution.
|
|
Rishabh Rps said:
(Sun, Mar 24, 2013 10:12:40 PM)
|
|
| |
War is not the solution. But sometimes situation are too bad and that's why War occurs but if we use Nuclear Bomb, It become a big cause of Humanity loss. And war is not start in between two country peoples. So why should we kill each others.
Every time in every war as King Ashoka in Kalinga battle thousand of peoples are killed so we have to be understand the loss from our history, our past experience.
So please say "No" to the wars. Specially Nuclear war. |
|
Rate this: +2 -4
|
|
Hritwik Singhai said:
(Sat, Mar 2, 2013 07:19:13 PM)
|
|
| |
| In my opinion, I feel that war in the present time is not much predictable, as every nation is friendly with others. With the fantastic efforts of United Nations, this topic is not much to be discussed. But still, if nuclear war happens, then I assure you that there will never be no next war, because nuclear war means end of everything, whether it be living or non-living. The best idea to secure ourselves is disarmament of such weapons which are extremely dangerous. All countries together should accept this proposal, so that we can save the next succeeding generations from the horrors of war. |
|
Rate this: +3 -1
|
|
Diti Bhattacharya said:
(Tue, Oct 30, 2012 11:27:43 AM)
|
|
| |
I don't think that a 3rd world war in the truest sense of the term will ever take place. As with the rise of terrorism and growing discontent among religious and ethnic groups wars have assumed a more "local" character. Large-scale wars have increased post Second World war but the risk of a nuclear stand-off is highly unlikely given the overwhelmingly destructive power of the nuclear tool, attracting widespread international repercussion that would obviously not go well with the image of the country using it. Which means that victory can be ensured in tangible terms but that would be eventually overshadowed and subdued by the human rights crises in the international scenario. So the best possible way of mending relations seem to be "dialogue" in the present globally economically interdependent world.
So even if nations are inclined to build up their nuclear capabilities I would say that just let them build their nukes because the more the countries go nuclear the lesser are the chances of having a nuclear warfare in the near future. |
|
Rate this: +4 -1
|
|
Sunil Rajdhaan said:
(Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:46:06 AM)
|
|
| |
| Wars are not the solution of problems. When it will be a nuclear war, how destructive it will be you know from the result of nuclear blast at Heroshima and Nagasakhi in Japan. Having nuclear weapons, is to show that our nation is powerful but we don't know the ultimate its results. As human beings we should keep our planet healthy i.e. free from harmful radiations. Moreover nuclear energy can be used for the constructive purpose. The third world war shall be the end of life on earth. True quote by Albert Einestien:"I don't know with which weapon will the 3rd world war happen but I can surely say that 4th world war will be fought with sticks and stones. So I think this unit of showing power should be changed by saying 'NO' to nuclear weapons. |
|
Rate this: +14 -4
|
|
Amit Kumar Rai said:
(Sun, Aug 26, 2012 08:19:47 PM)
|
|
| |
| 67 years has passed, but people of Hiroshima and Nagasaki are still suffering from the radiation that spread after nuclear attack in second world war. Nuclear war is something which will not only have the instant catastrophic results in form of a mass genocide in fractions of seconds but it will also have a prolonged effect for many generations. First of all war should be avoided. But if War situation is there then go for traditional war methods: military, navy, army or by pressurizing the enemy country through ban and other tactics. Use of nuclear weapon may finish the war in seconds, you might win but the humanity will lose. We cannot see another Hiroshima and Nagasaki burning to ashes. |
|
Rate this: +10 -4
|
|
Somase M said:
(Sat, Jul 7, 2012 11:46:39 PM)
|
|
| |
Good evening gentleman,
The opinion some of my friends saying that war has newer inevitable, but I am not completely agree with them. Because war is not small thing like a purchases vegetables from market, and specially nuclear war in which no one country can be won fully with profit. For example maximum nation exceptionally by some countries having nuclear power but no one want to take initiative to use the power, because they are very well known with nuton's theory that"Every action has equal and opposite reaction. "Every nation knows if any of there city went under the suffering of nuclear disaster they know the price what they have to pay.
So gentleman we the youth of nation has to come forward to take initiative to make awareness about the nuclear power, that use this power as boon not as ban. To make light in the house of one not spread darkness in the world.
Thank you Gentleman to giving me your valuable time. |
|
Rate this: +16 -6
|
|
Sakshi said:
(Fri, May 18, 2012 03:46:30 PM)
|
|
| |
| Nuclear power is a boon as well as bane, but I personally think that if human beings are aware of their life's so they should avoid and restrict the nuclear power in negative sense as much as they can. On the topic of nuclear war I think it should be strictly prohibited by us. |
|
Rate this: +8 -2
|
|
Subin Mat said:
(Fri, Mar 16, 2012 05:59:57 PM)
|
|
| |
War is inevitable, sooner the better, long has our country lingered in the shadows of peace and tranquility, we have so much to boast about yet we made no attempts to seize our destiny, make no mistakes its us or them, either we forge an empire from blood and iron and embrace the greatness that was always meant for us, or wither away like we have never existed. There cannot be a better time than this, don't confuse this equilibrium with peace, there will be no mercy.
"Peace is for the womens and the weak, empires are forged by war" - illiad |
|
Rate this: +5 -9
|
|
Pavan said:
(Sun, Mar 11, 2012 04:37:52 PM)
|
|
| |
| Nuclear war cannot be won, its a known fact and that is the reason why it is not being used. Its power is known to everyone after the Japan tragedy, having a nuclear bomb adds great strength to the country's armory, I mean its a defensive strategy more than attacking, It alarms the countries involved in war that there is a risk of being attacked my nuclear weapons so that they eventually try to make peace with eachother. A fear of higher power is always necessary, when such a higher power is used it leads to humanity's grave. |
|
Rate this: +9 -1
|
|
Pankaj said:
(Thu, Feb 23, 2012 06:28:09 PM)
|
|
| |
I am not against keeping the nuclear power with us. Acc to me this is the strongest thing, which shows the country power, but its utilization is the main concept. We should know how to preserve this. Its utilization can be shown by developing the power generation and minimizing the use of non-renewable resources.
But I am not in the favour of using it in the war time as its effect will not be for short time, it will last for generations and we will be the worst example to our children who spoiled their life. We all know the result of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Also a lot of technology and monetary loss occur which is not recoverable. So avoid war and use nuclear power efficiently and effectively. |
|
Rate this: +5 -2
|
|
Neha said:
(Mon, Feb 20, 2012 04:41:35 PM)
|
|
| |
Nuclear energy uses to be derived nucleus of an atom.It generates an chain reation which throws out gamma rays which is harmful for the human and other living species.Take the example of japanese cities Hiroshima and Nagasaki.The event occured during the 2nd world war when americans dropped the nuclear bombs on the cities.Even today also,mentally or physically degenrated children are taking birth over their. UNO has strictly instructed every nation not to use any nuclear in a bad way.Still today also nations have nuclear bombs and the explaination given by each nation is for the security purpose.
If 3rd world war happens it is surely going to be a nuclear war as nations will not think about each other's welfare.They are just gonna think about each other's destruction to win the war and to be world's gretest power.It will destroy the mankind, environment and other species.Earth will not be a place to live.
Quoting Albert Einestien's world:"I dont know with which weapon will the 3rd world war happen but I can surely say that 4th world war will be fought with sticks and stones." I think the statement itself can suggest the situation after 3rd world war. |
|
Rate this: +27 -4
|
|
Mann said:
(Sat, Feb 11, 2012 02:11:41 AM)
|
|
| |
I think that none of the nation should go for nuclear war because it's just loss of money and life. Instead of making nuclear weapon if that money is used in used in building schools, colleges, hospitals then it will be good for the betterment of society. As in nuclear fission reaction lots of energy is liberated so that energy should be used positively for electricity generation.
So we should stop nuclear wars to save present and future generation. |
|
Rate this: +4 -1
|
|
Ghanshyam said:
(Tue, Feb 7, 2012 11:36:29 PM)
|
|
| |
If we consider our history wars have never fetch any good ever, be it India and pakistan or any other country of world, It has always put the countries many years back in terms of prosperity and developement. In todays modern world new advanced nuclear weapons are emerging as new warfares to protect oneself which has perpetual detrimental impact over the people for generations to come as we have seen in Japan. However if we use this nuclear energy in positive way 4 generating electricity it may come out as a boon to us.
So we should focus to make our world better place to live rather then making it hell by getting involved in nuclear wars. |
|
Rate this: +5 -1
|
|
Veer Antil said:
(Mon, Nov 28, 2011 01:58:37 PM)
|
|
| |
| Now days life of every person is a struggle. We all facing many other problem like as increase of population, corruption, black marketing and question is rising that how to growth? war is not solution because if today we are in power, it is not possible that we will remain powerful always. Science and technology was made for human help but machine and technology overcome on human. We all know that nuclear war create a great disaster in the whole word. Nobody win in the war everybody loose, less or more. This statement is true that never serve sweet in the quarrel. So, why we use nuclear power in war. It is the boon of science and technology for human growth and nations development. So, there is no solution in nuclear war. I think we should be should use nuclear power for electricity power generation that's make our future life safe and easy. That will create growth in human life. |
|
Rate this: +16 -2
|
|
Clearthought said:
(Sat, Nov 5, 2011 09:02:53 PM)
|
|
| |
| I disagree with the every poster here. With the way in which our population is touching unprecedented levels, only a full blown nuclear exchange with a rival can save this country from utter catastrophe.How else could we feed, clothe and employ all those beings? Bitter it may be, but that's the truth. |
|
Rate this: +8 -14
|
|
Abhijeet Men said:
(Tue, Sep 6, 2011 10:46:58 PM)
|
|
| |
Its very true that nuclear war can't be won and Shouldnt be faught.
We all human being living in society all having their competition with one another to make their high standard in a society. Nw a days all are very educated they knows the good and bad of perticular thing so I think there should be a good relationship with neighbour to make peace in a society. That is what exctly happening in between countries, so there should be a nuclear deal with them to make the peace in world. |
|
Rate this: +4 -2
|
|
Rahul said:
(Fri, Aug 26, 2011 09:28:13 PM)
|
|
| |
| To celebrate the winning one must live first.after nuclear war countries will have more casualties than wid non nuclear war.usage of nuclear is banned under UNSC regulations.i think it is one of the most important taken by UN to maintain peace.WHAT happen in hiroshiman and nagasaki was very unfortunate and even now they have to pay the effects of radiations.so in brief it just destroy the current and coming generation |
|
Rate this: +8 -1
|
|
Mathew said:
(Thu, Jul 14, 2011 05:30:03 AM)
|
|
| |
The sucess of nuclear deterrence may turn out to be its own undoing, Nuclear weapons helped in keeping peace between nations in the cold war era, preventing the dispute from engulfing the nations in onother catastrophic conflict. But after nearly 65years without a major war or nuclear attack many prominent scholars, statesmen and analyst have begun to take deterance for granted. They are now calling for a major drawdown of these nuclear arsenal and a commitment to pursue peace without these weapons.
Well I say to every body that getting nuclear weapons to zero is not a solution, for the very exisistence of nuclear weapons is what keeping our adverseries deterred, In addition to that our country is pursuing a policy of "no first use" to keep the tension low. |
|
Rate this: +5 -1
|
|
Rushikesh Daiyya said:
(Tue, Jun 28, 2011 07:01:35 AM)
|
|
| |
| We should not do fight with each other because by fighting many soldiers get died so their wife become widow and their family members became very sad so we should not fight instead of fighting we should make peace. |
|
Rate this: +2 -5
|
|
Rasika Joshi said:
(Sun, Jun 26, 2011 12:32:36 AM)
|
|
| |
| We all know that nuclear war will create a big disaster in whole world. I think by fighting NOBODY is going to win or loose, everyone is going to suffer. So in this case if there is no question of winning or loosing and is not going to help anyone at all, there is no point in fighting. |
|
Rate this: +10 -1
|
|
Priyank Gupta said:
(Sun, May 1, 2011 07:31:34 AM)
|
|
| |
I am completely agree with this nuclear war can't be won. Nuclear power has to be used in positive way. It can be used to produce electricity. By nuclear war only countries can be finished. Many generations are effected badly like we have seen in Japan nothing more.
So there is no solution in Nuclear War. |
|
Rate this: +4 -0
|
|
Sindhu said:
(Fri, Apr 29, 2011 01:23:32 AM)
|
|
| |
Unless and until man develops his so called self control the nuclear war will emerge out of nuclear weapons. Everyone should check his thinking. If its not possible to inculcate positive approach among people its better stopping the use of nuclear technology.
Because even for the development there should be a race called mankind which will be eliminated if these weapons are misused. |
|
Rate this: +1 -1
|
|
Senam Pandey said:
(Sat, Apr 23, 2011 10:31:50 PM)
|
|
| |
| I also agree with this, as we know using nuclear weapons we destroy not only destroy mankind or people life but we also destroy our future generation. In war between two countries destroy those people also who even don't know why is it happen. We have many other things where we can use our brain to construct something good for our nation instead of that we make power which destroy yourself only. |
|
Rate this: +2 -1
|
|
Sumit Singh said:
(Thu, Feb 17, 2011 09:37:34 AM)
|
|
| |
Hi I m sumit in my oponion we solve any matter with peace not with war this is correct.
Solution. And we are live in developing country and if we want to solve our economical conditon then first we banned on such thes nucleae bomb like thing for maintening peace we have good example of Mahatama Gandhi. Who give us good moraland also show the correct.
Power of peace. So use our money in making things which are helpful in giving the nation.
Benifit. Not to making which make dissaster. |
|
Rate this: +4 -2
|
|
Pavan Reddy said:
(Tue, Feb 15, 2011 10:38:36 AM)
|
|
| |
| Science is a store for all the greatest things in this world!. Progressing isn't wrong either it be in creating weapons or technology!. Its just the love for technology and how far we can go to get d best out of it!. Having seen the world war2 stronger nations managed to secure themselves having wider technology at least more then the less stronger ones!. So if one nation possesses a nuclear weapon it invariably can become a threat to the other nations! if question of national security arises it should be used as an element of defence but not as a threat!. So it should not be fought and cannot be won! |
|
Rate this: +3 -0
|
|
Jeetu said:
(Tue, Feb 15, 2011 01:55:02 AM)
|
|
| |
Science has discovered many things which we are using for our benefits, nuclear is one among them as we know very well every thing has a pros n cons so the nuclear has the same, it depends on the human being how they use, once nuclear bomb was blasted in the lands of Hiroshima and Nagasaki the effect of those bomb we can see till date, the new born infants are abnormal, n also it has effected the land, the land can't be used for cultivation.
If something which effecting the society so much then why to invent such thing. I think the united government body should take necessary action to ban all such things not just in one country but around the globe. They should take severe action on the country who doesn't follow it though we can make power (electricity) out of it but we don't want a power out of death. Eradicate it completely no matter what we loose. No nuclear deal nothing. |
|
Rate this: +1 -1
|
|
Jaya said:
(Mon, Feb 14, 2011 01:37:53 AM)
|
|
| |
| In my opinion nuclear war should not be fought because the whole world familiar with the output of the nuclear war. It would create a huge disaster in the world. Only solution to save this is good relationship with other countries like nuclear deal. |
|
Rate this: +1 -0
|
|
Harish said:
(Fri, Feb 11, 2011 08:51:55 AM)
|
|
| |
| As I suggest nuclear war should be stopped because it greatly destructs the country and lower its economy. As we know the nuclear weapons are very costly and takes the life of thousands of peoples in microseconds, then how we make our economy strong by loosing such a great money in seconds beside it takes life. I think this nuclear energy should be should for power generation so that it makes our future safe. |
|
Rate this: +14 -0
|
|
Nikit Gupta said:
(Fri, Feb 11, 2011 03:02:41 AM)
|
|
| |
Nothing will remain after a nuclear war. Heroshima and Nagasakhi are still suffering the worse effect of nuclear power even after so many years. So I want to say that why will choose nuclear war option. We can discuss and sort out the problem without any mess. And this is one of the best method to represent our issues and solve the problem. Every country want to live save life either is India or pakistan so on.
I think nuclear weapon should not be use neither present or past. |
|
Rate this: +0 -2
|
|
S.A,Bica said:
(Tue, Feb 8, 2011 12:57:20 AM)
|
|
| |
I am Ambica from Hyderabad. I believe that God has created and gifted so many beautiful things in this Universe specially in the earth. Every human nature has to understand this. For the survival of every human nature God has provided all the eminities. Among all the living nature only man is gifted with sharp brain, beautiful heart.
Due to fear fact we are taking hard decisions. To protect ourselves we are harming the other one. We are using our power in a wrong way. Now a days every country is trying to get equipped with nuclear power and weapons. But we are forgetting the fact that with the use of this power we may destroy the human kind. Years after also the generations suffer with this power. God has gifted us all the resources and comforts to make our lives happy. But we are using them for the purpose of destruction.
I think no war can be won with bloodshed and destruction of human kind. Hence I would suggest that all the critical matters or issues has to be sorted out with peaceful discussion. I also recommend that nuclear energy must become the source of income and helpful to the mankind. |
|
Rate this: +2 -0
|
|
Rishabh said:
(Sun, Feb 6, 2011 03:50:54 PM)
|
|
| |
Nuclear energy produces a huge amount of energy during the nuclear reaction. This energy can be used in both the ways that is in useful way or in destructive way and to choose one of the way is in the hands of human and its nature.
Useful way:it provides energy which would be used to produce electricity and will provide electricity to large extent of area(depend upon the use of electricity).
Destructive way: As we all know the power of nuclear energy so we know that how much it would be destructive as we have seen earlier during the war as on hiroshima and nagasaki.
So the use of this power should be depend upon the humanity which has to choose this beautiful earth where we live or the place where there is nothing to take care of us and this humanity.
So nuclear war should not take place in future at any cost. |
|
Rate this: +1 -0
|
|
Rahul said:
(Mon, Jan 31, 2011 08:18:13 AM)
|
|
| |
| Although nuclear power is very useful for various fields, every nation should know the bad effects of the nuclear power.If once there is a nuclear war then it destroys the whole world.So nuclear war must be baned and every nation should be careful about it. |
|
Rate this: +1 -0
|
|
Saurav Agarwal said:
(Tue, Jan 25, 2011 04:44:57 AM)
|
|
| |
Well all of us know that today the energy producing sources are exhausting everywhere and noone needs to be told has to how important petrol and other such fuels are to the entire world. So if the governments of various country come together to generate energy rather than weapons it would first and foremost eliminate the threat that every superpower as well as the people around the globe are facing regarding nuclear war and at the same time would bring about electricity to all the areas which still are facing power crisis.
As some famous person said when asked about the outcome of the third world war, "I do not know with what kinds of weapons the Third World War will be fought, but the Fourth World War will be fought with sticks and stones" |
|
Rate this: +1 -0
|
|
Tushar Palekar said:
(Mon, Jan 24, 2011 11:40:16 AM)
|
|
| |
Yes I agree with that,we should use this nuclear power in other better field which can help in various way.there are various field where we use this power.
THERE ARE ALWAYS TWO PHASES OF COIN,so we have to see only the positive phase of this nuclear power and have to avoid the negative one.If we choose the right option,we can use this power as strength in any field.As we know that there are very serious issue of fuel are present among us,so we can use this power in various field as a fuel.
I think that the country has to be agree on the nuclear deal. |
|
Rate this: +2 -0
|
|
Lt .Priyanka said:
(Sun, Jan 23, 2011 09:55:28 AM)
|
|
| |
| Wars are always faught to win. No nation wants to initiate the war and loose it. Every country be it developed ore developing possesses nuclear weapon in that scenario if any war is faught and war initiating country shows the ultimate threat of nuclear weapons then instead of loosin the war and cause misery to the society of the nation it is better to use Nuclear Weapon by taking initiative to stop the war and win it. Had America not used the atomic weapon during world war 2, the scenario would have been something else and more destructive. |
|
Rate this: +6 -1
|
|
Ch.Naresh said:
(Fri, Jan 21, 2011 06:04:24 AM)
|
|
| |
I strongly believe that we should oppose nations keen in developing nuclear based security for handling threats.Proper discussions should be made to mantain peace between nations to develop themselves and let them others.
so,use nuclear energy in developing society not to kill society. |
|
Rate this: +1 -0
|
|
Kirti Malik said:
(Wed, Jan 12, 2011 07:28:14 AM)
|
|
| |
Nuclear weapons can harm the human world to such a great extent that no one can imagine. Someone has correctly said that-IF THE THIRD WORLD WAR HAPPENS, IT WILL BE A NUCLEAR WAR. Whatever be the result mankind will always lose. The energy produced by them is enormously high that can destroy the whole earth.
Science we use is a boon to us. Man should use it for his betterment not for his destruction. Nuclear energy can be used for the completion of energy needs.
I strongly feel that nuclear weapons must be destroyed. All nations must agree on this better use of nuclear energy. |
|
Rate this: +1 -0
|
|
M Suraj said:
(Mon, Jan 3, 2011 09:27:48 PM)
|
|
| |
| Nothing is left after a nuclear war. Heroshima and Nagasakhi are still suffering the worse effect of nuclear power even after so many years. Their production make no use to human's society except destruction. Just we need to put a full stop to nuclear warheads and make their use in production of good energy. |
|
Rate this: +0 -0
|
|
Sushil said:
(Sun, Dec 26, 2010 12:56:55 PM)
|
|
| |
We know very well that almost each county has nuclear weapons for there safety and there should not be any type of nuclear war because in today's world there is not any country that can enjoy there victory due to a huge lose or may be total lose of human beings.
So we should try to convert this nuclear war into nuclear deal. |
|
Rate this: +2 -0
|
|
Mohan said:
(Sat, Dec 25, 2010 09:19:02 PM)
|
|
| |
Nuclear war should not be fought according to me. Since they only create disastrous effects for the existing generations and create problems for years after. If this continues, then God's most precious creation so called "human beings" will have to face physical challenges that is dreadfully dangerous for the existence.
Hence proper steps should be taken to reduce nuclear war as they can't be won. |
|
Rate this: +0 -0
|
|
Loknath Sahu said:
(Sat, Dec 25, 2010 01:37:06 AM)
|
|
| |
Nuclear power is very strong and destructive for the wellfare and destruction of society. The science has invented many things, now it depends upon us how we use it. If science has invented a knife for cutting apple, but you are cutting someone neck. So the usage of nuclear power depends on the attitude of society.
In my concern, nuclear power should be only used for the wellfare of the society. Through using nuclear, we may able to generate huge energy that we would be able to fulfill the need of society population of around 8 billion. The nuclear energy may be alternative sources of natural resources like Petrol, disel and gas. India has signed many nuclear agreement with other countries like the US, EU and china. Today one country is not believing to other easily. That's why every country is busy in making nuclear boms and dangerous instruments. I don't think this is good anyway.
I am completely against the having nuclear weapons. There is no surity that when Pakistan might attack in India or when America would attack on Iran etc. The effect of nuclear bom is very disastrous. For instance, Hirosima and Nagasaki. There should be never especially nuclear war. It can destroy the nature as well as the existance of humanity. |
|
Rate this: +5 -0
|
|
Arpit Pal said:
(Thu, Dec 23, 2010 03:07:44 PM)
|
|
| |
Yes it is true that if there is a nuclear war in future it will end without any country winning but the whole world loosing. So all the nuclear powers(nation) should immediately come to a agreement of destroying all their nuclear weapons and should take a firm resolution to use nuclear energy for peaceful purposes only.
|
|
Rate this: +0 -0
|
|
Pooja said:
(Sat, Dec 18, 2010 12:21:50 AM)
|
|
| |
I think, in way of developing countries it will be very harmful because developing countries face the many problems, like economical wise, disaster wise etc.
So please try to avoid this situation. |
|
Rate this: +0 -0
|
|
B.Prasad Reddy said:
(Thu, Jul 22, 2010 03:00:33 AM)
|
|
| |
Now a days, all the Nations are rapidly developing. All countries facing common problem that is Nuclear war. The nucler war affected all human beings are so much, it should be injuries to future human beings.So, we have good thing in nucler deals that is produce eletricity from that. So, my request to all is take good from Bad. So, all countries can solve their problems with discuss to each others.
"Discussion can solve the problem but Nuclear war can not solve the problem". All people want peace. |
|
Rate this: +3 -3
|
|
|