Verbal Ability - Comprehension - Discussion

Discussion Forum : Comprehension - Section 4 (Q.No. 1)
Directions to Solve
Laws of nature are not commands but statements of acts. The use of the word "law" in this context is rather unfortunate. It would be better to speak of uniformities in nature. This would do away with the elementary fallacy that a law implies a law giver. If a piece of matter does not obey a law of nature it is punished. On the contrary, we say that the law has been incorrectly started.

1.
If a piece of matter violates nature's law, it is not punished because
it is not binding to obey it
there is no superior being to enforce the law of nature
it cannot be punished
it simply means that the facts have not been correctly stated by law
Answer: Option
Explanation:
No answer description is available. Let's discuss.
Discussion:
24 comments Page 3 of 3.

Akshatha said:   1 decade ago
Answer: D, The passage does not say anything about superior being. But mentions " we say that the law has been incorrectly started", so option D it is.

Manindar said:   1 decade ago
@Sundar

You are right. Since in the last line it stated that," On the contrary, we say that the law has been incorrectly started. ". it tells us that there is a possibility that it could has been started correctly.

It means that there is no one to control these laws. Hence option (B) is correct.

Sundar said:   1 decade ago
@All

You missed one thing to note that is "On the contrary,...".

The given answer is correct I hope.

Deepesh Mishra said:   1 decade ago
The ans must be D. As stated in the last line, "we say that the law has been incorrectly started." simply means what is said in option D.


Post your comments here:

Your comments will be displayed after verification.