Verbal Ability - Comprehension - Discussion

Answer should be B because we say that the law started incorrectly.

Good @Akshay.

Laws of nature are not comments but statements of acts ---this implies that is not compulsory to follow that law.

The following sentences are enlightening.

"This would do away with the elementary fallacy that a law implies a lawgiver. If a piece of matter does not obey a law of nature it is punished".

Bear in mind that these statements are false statements, meaning to say, the law (of nature) has NO GIVER and If a piece of matter does not obey a law of nature it is NOT punished. These statements are related. It is NOT punished because the law has NO GIVER. No one will enforce the law of nature.

There is a contradiction in the text and the question: which is, the text says--if a piece of matter doesn't obey the law of nature 'it is punshed'. Therefore, the words ón the contrary' cannot be the determining factor. Hence, D is correct.

There is a contradiction in the text and the question : which is say - ''if a piece of matter violates nature's law, it is not punished because" - Therefore,

There is no superior being to enforce the law of nature (B) is correct answer because Law of nature it's not "If a piece of matter does not obey a law of nature it is punished".

In a paragraph such a pleasure of nature rule and (D) option is a the facts have not been correctly stated by law not is show violates and superiority so I think and I should be Answer option (B).

"This would do away with the elementary fallacy that a law implies a lawgiver. If a piece of matter does not obey a law of nature it is punished".

Bear in mind that these statements are false statements, meaning to say, the law (of nature) has NO GIVER and If a piece of matter does not obey a law of nature it is NOT punished. These statements are related. It is NOT punished because the law has NO GIVER. No one will enforce the law of nature.

Correct Answer is [B].

There is no superior being to enforce the law of nature.

"If a piece of matter does not obey a law of nature it is punished. On the contrary, we say that the law has been incorrectly started" mind this statement and question is asked in contrarily that is if sth does not obey this means if sth goes against to nature it get punished but not, in contrast, this means if nature itself do wrong that is right only why because there is no superior being to enforce the law of nature.

Correct answer is "C".

If a piece of matter does not obey a law of nature it is punished.