Logical Reasoning - Course of Action - Discussion
Discussion Forum : Course of Action - Section 1 (Q.No. 6)
Directions to Solve
In each question below is given a statement followed by two courses of action numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true and on the basis of the information given in the statement, decide which of the suggested courses of action logically follow(s) for pursuing.
Give answer
- (A) If only I follows
- (B) If only II follows
- (C) If either I or II follows
- (D) If neither I nor II follows
- (E) If both I and II follow.
6.
Statement: Most of those who study in premier engineering colleges in India migrate to developed nations for better prospects in their professional pursuits.
Courses of Action:
- All the students joining these colleges should be asked to sign a bond at the time of admission to the effect that they will remain in India at least for ten years after they complete education.
- All those students who desire to settle in the developed nations should be asked to pay entire cost of their education which the government subsidises.
Answer: Option
Explanation:
Clearly, no student can be bound to live and work in the country against his wish. So, I does not follow. However, it is quite right to recover the extra benefits awarded to students if they do not serve their own country. So, II follows.
Discussion:
28 comments Page 3 of 3.
Ak96 said:
1 decade ago
I disagree with the answer.
The right answer should be C either 1 or 2 since the government has the right to recover the amount they subsidized for the students, and so it could be done by either of the two ways. Firstly; would be for the students to earn in the same country and pay up by way of tax etc for a certain period i.e option 1 OR the other option being paying of the subsidized amount before leaving the country for another better well developed nation i.e option 2.
Also the student will not be bound to stay in his own country as he/she will have the 'option' to sign the bond, if not he/she could continue without taking govt subsidies and pursue the same.
The right answer should be C either 1 or 2 since the government has the right to recover the amount they subsidized for the students, and so it could be done by either of the two ways. Firstly; would be for the students to earn in the same country and pay up by way of tax etc for a certain period i.e option 1 OR the other option being paying of the subsidized amount before leaving the country for another better well developed nation i.e option 2.
Also the student will not be bound to stay in his own country as he/she will have the 'option' to sign the bond, if not he/she could continue without taking govt subsidies and pursue the same.
Urja said:
1 decade ago
It needs to be D.
There is no mention in the question about who is authorized to take action against the argument.
There is no mention in the question about who is authorized to take action against the argument.
Vamsi said:
1 decade ago
Neither professional prospects should be developed in the native country.
Nilesh said:
1 decade ago
I also disagree with answer as every person is free to choose his career in any country.
DINESH said:
1 decade ago
I disagree with answer because may be its better to sign a bond at the time of admission.
Mohnish paliwal said:
1 decade ago
Every people is free to take decision and another thing is that there was no deal like this at the time of subsidies was given to student so I completely disagree with this course of action.
Akash Shrivastava said:
1 decade ago
Ya I agree, A should be the answer.
It is possible that after completing their education, they can go for foreign prospects even after paying the entire cost of education assuming that they will get greater package.
A won't be the ideal solution but it will be more effective out of these two.
Any other thoughts? Please share.
It is possible that after completing their education, they can go for foreign prospects even after paying the entire cost of education assuming that they will get greater package.
A won't be the ideal solution but it will be more effective out of these two.
Any other thoughts? Please share.
Priyanjit said:
1 decade ago
I disagree with the answer above.
A bond sign is necessary. This way students are bound to serve their country after graduation. It does not limit his prospects of going abroad. The terms and conditions of the bond can be made such that its possible to break a bond by paying a monetary amount equivalent to the total course fee that was subsidized by the govt. including interests.
A bond sign is necessary. This way students are bound to serve their country after graduation. It does not limit his prospects of going abroad. The terms and conditions of the bond can be made such that its possible to break a bond by paying a monetary amount equivalent to the total course fee that was subsidized by the govt. including interests.
Post your comments here:
Quick links
Quantitative Aptitude
Verbal (English)
Reasoning
Programming
Interview
Placement Papers