Should Management Education be subsidized?
Points to remember before you participate in this discussion:
- Assume you are one of the members of a real group discussion.
- Take the initiative to participate and contribute your thoughts.
- Contribute your positive thoughts towards providing the solution.
- Post your thoughts here.
Discussion:
38 comments Page 4 of 4.
Sandy said:
1 decade ago
Hello Everyone! I would like to put some light on this topic. I think yes the management studies should be subsidized, but in a more organised manner or rather with respect to the merit, Not to all the students, what I mean is a kind of a barometer or a merit limit has to be set by the institutions, so that the meritorious students who successfully falls under that coveted merit limit should be eligible for the subsidized tuition fees. And the rest who does not fall under the merit limit can study but should not get subsidized fees. This method might provide both transparency and credibility of a particular institutional body.
(4)
Bala said:
1 decade ago
Management education should be subsidized because in India there are lot of students with all talents but they don't have money to enter in a higher institution the institution should help those people to get participated in developing economical status of our country.
(4)
Shivam said:
9 years ago
Hello, everyone!
I would like to say that the management education should be subsidized because there are many students who never get the chance to study due to the high fee structure but on the other hand it should be done properly as - exam should be conducted for entrance and the students who qualify the exam and belong to poor family should be grant subsidy.
I would like to say that the management education should be subsidized because there are many students who never get the chance to study due to the high fee structure but on the other hand it should be done properly as - exam should be conducted for entrance and the students who qualify the exam and belong to poor family should be grant subsidy.
(2)
Samara said:
9 years ago
Management education should be subsidized. The fees of top B-schools range from 30-40K. It becomes difficult for the student to directly apply for management studies after graduation. Many are forced to take hefty educational loans from the bank. Although placements are guaranteed in Top B-schools but the first 2 years of their earning goes to pay back the loan.
(2)
RENJINI R NAIR said:
1 decade ago
Hai friends. According to me, management education should not be subsidized, because any one can get an admission in any institution but we cannot assure that they all are enough talented. So merit should be the criteria for getting admission in the right institution.
(2)
PMO said:
2 years ago
Hello, fellow forum members,
I wanted to spark a discussion on the topic of whether management education should be subsidized. In my humble opinion, I firmly believe that subsidizing management education can yield remarkable benefits for individuals, society, and the economy as a whole.
First and foremost, subsidizing management education allows greater accessibility and inclusivity. It provides opportunities for aspiring students from diverse backgrounds who may otherwise be unable to afford such education.
By leveling the playing field, we empower talented individuals to pursue their dreams and contribute their unique perspectives to the field of management.
Moreover, subsidized management education fosters innovation and growth. By investing in the development of future leaders, we equip them with the necessary knowledge and skills to navigate complex business challenges. These leaders, armed with their education, can drive entrepreneurial initiatives, create jobs, and stimulate economic prosperity.
Additionally, management education benefits society by nurturing ethical leadership. Subsidized programs often emphasize values such as integrity, social responsibility, and sustainability. By instilling these principles in our future managers, we can create a more conscious and compassionate business environment, where profit and purpose coexist harmoniously.
Lastly, subsidizing management education aligns with the long-term interests of governments and economies. Well-educated managers contribute to better decision-making, effective resource allocation, and improved organizational performance. These factors translate into a more competitive business landscape, attracting investment and driving economic growth.
In conclusion, subsidizing management education is a powerful investment that pays dividends for individuals, society, and the economy at large. It promotes inclusivity, fuels innovation, nurtures ethical leadership, and strengthens economic competitiveness.
By ensuring that the next generation of managers is well-equipped and diverse, we pave the way for a brighter and more prosperous future for all.
I wanted to spark a discussion on the topic of whether management education should be subsidized. In my humble opinion, I firmly believe that subsidizing management education can yield remarkable benefits for individuals, society, and the economy as a whole.
First and foremost, subsidizing management education allows greater accessibility and inclusivity. It provides opportunities for aspiring students from diverse backgrounds who may otherwise be unable to afford such education.
By leveling the playing field, we empower talented individuals to pursue their dreams and contribute their unique perspectives to the field of management.
Moreover, subsidized management education fosters innovation and growth. By investing in the development of future leaders, we equip them with the necessary knowledge and skills to navigate complex business challenges. These leaders, armed with their education, can drive entrepreneurial initiatives, create jobs, and stimulate economic prosperity.
Additionally, management education benefits society by nurturing ethical leadership. Subsidized programs often emphasize values such as integrity, social responsibility, and sustainability. By instilling these principles in our future managers, we can create a more conscious and compassionate business environment, where profit and purpose coexist harmoniously.
Lastly, subsidizing management education aligns with the long-term interests of governments and economies. Well-educated managers contribute to better decision-making, effective resource allocation, and improved organizational performance. These factors translate into a more competitive business landscape, attracting investment and driving economic growth.
In conclusion, subsidizing management education is a powerful investment that pays dividends for individuals, society, and the economy at large. It promotes inclusivity, fuels innovation, nurtures ethical leadership, and strengthens economic competitiveness.
By ensuring that the next generation of managers is well-equipped and diverse, we pave the way for a brighter and more prosperous future for all.
(1)
PMaspire said:
2 years ago
Hello all.
Today, I want to explore a topic that has been lingering in my mind for quite some time: the subsidy of management education. I firmly believe that subsidizing management education is a crucial step toward fostering a brighter and more prosperous future for individuals and society as a whole.
Firstly, by making management education more affordable, we can ensure that talented individuals from diverse socioeconomic backgrounds have equal access to quality education. This inclusivity empowers individuals who might otherwise be deterred by financial constraints to pursue their passion and contribute their unique perspectives to the field of management.
Additionally, subsidization of management education promotes innovation and economic growth. By equipping aspiring managers with the necessary skills and knowledge, we encourage entrepreneurial endeavors, job creation, and sustainable development. These well-educated managers can foster an environment of competitiveness and excellence, leading to a thriving economy that benefits everyone.
Moreover, management education plays a pivotal role in nurturing leadership qualities and instilling ethical values in aspiring managers. Through subsidized education, we can ensure that future leaders are equipped with a strong moral compass, ethical decision-making abilities, and a deep sense of social responsibility. This will contribute to the creation of a more equitable and sustainable society.
Critics may argue that subsidizing management education could lead to an oversupply of managers in the job market. However, I believe that in today's rapidly evolving business landscape, the demand for competent managers far outweighs the potential oversupply. Furthermore, subsidization can be paired with measures to ensure that students are adequately prepared for the demands of the industry, thus striking a balance between supply and demand.
In conclusion, subsidizing management education is an investment in the future. By making it more accessible and affordable, we provide opportunities for talented individuals, stimulate economic growth, and cultivate ethical leadership. Let us embrace the potential of subsidized management education and work towards a brighter and more prosperous tomorrow.
Today, I want to explore a topic that has been lingering in my mind for quite some time: the subsidy of management education. I firmly believe that subsidizing management education is a crucial step toward fostering a brighter and more prosperous future for individuals and society as a whole.
Firstly, by making management education more affordable, we can ensure that talented individuals from diverse socioeconomic backgrounds have equal access to quality education. This inclusivity empowers individuals who might otherwise be deterred by financial constraints to pursue their passion and contribute their unique perspectives to the field of management.
Additionally, subsidization of management education promotes innovation and economic growth. By equipping aspiring managers with the necessary skills and knowledge, we encourage entrepreneurial endeavors, job creation, and sustainable development. These well-educated managers can foster an environment of competitiveness and excellence, leading to a thriving economy that benefits everyone.
Moreover, management education plays a pivotal role in nurturing leadership qualities and instilling ethical values in aspiring managers. Through subsidized education, we can ensure that future leaders are equipped with a strong moral compass, ethical decision-making abilities, and a deep sense of social responsibility. This will contribute to the creation of a more equitable and sustainable society.
Critics may argue that subsidizing management education could lead to an oversupply of managers in the job market. However, I believe that in today's rapidly evolving business landscape, the demand for competent managers far outweighs the potential oversupply. Furthermore, subsidization can be paired with measures to ensure that students are adequately prepared for the demands of the industry, thus striking a balance between supply and demand.
In conclusion, subsidizing management education is an investment in the future. By making it more accessible and affordable, we provide opportunities for talented individuals, stimulate economic growth, and cultivate ethical leadership. Let us embrace the potential of subsidized management education and work towards a brighter and more prosperous tomorrow.
(1)
Parasaa gowthami said:
9 months ago
I would like to share my opinion on "Should management education be subsidized" Yes it should because govt should provide money to those who are studying if not so the poor cannot achieve their goals.
For most of the students who want to pursue management education, it is difficult for them to do it because of exorbitant fees.
For most of the students who want to pursue management education, it is difficult for them to do it because of exorbitant fees.
Post your thoughts here:
Quick links
Quantitative Aptitude
Verbal (English)
Reasoning
Programming
Interview
Placement Papers