Presidential v/s Parliamentary Form of Government in India

Hello every one. My name is Hani Chaudhary.

I will suggest parliamentary form of government is because of following reason:

1. It lowers the work force.

2. More people will be accounted for any cause of action.

3. Parliamentary system distribute the power because bureaucrat headed by the president and legislature system is headed by prime minister of India.

And I will suggest presidential system because of following reason:

1. Presidential system allows fast action on any any issue, so it is less time consuming in compare with parliamentary system.

Thank you every one.

In India there are various religions and casts so parliamentary goverment is not effective in India as England. Now a days due to this type of goverment many regional political powers are rising which is very harmful for the nation of India. I strongly support presidential rule, but there are some conditions like it should be democratic, the president must be elected by the people of india, and a face which is well known to all should be given the power because if the people are aware of the character and the nature of the nominated persons then it would be better to elect the best one.

I feel that to select for prime minister or for president must keep a test, the top ten persons are eligible in elections. And he/she should not have any criminal record and should be a social worker.

If this is possible what ever the system is good. Here the person is important not the system.

That is a very good point Manju but don't you think that the present form of government in India is Parliamentary and it is in no way exemplary.Of course there are 1000 of different religion but hasn't that spawned the problem of reservations in our country.maybe its high time we think over our cultural aspects and personal identities and think about the country. A Presidential rule for about 5 years will at least bring down the corrupt politicians out of power and maybe then a new government can be formed.

I think that parliamentary form of government is better as prevents the prime minister from becoming a dictator. President should always pass the bills according to his opinion along with other people's thought.

I favour parliamentary form of government in India. The presidential system is quite flawed and is not suitable for a country like India which is the second biggest nation in terms of population and whose diversity in terms of language, culture and religion is immense. The presidential system has many demerits such as:

* Encourages a 2-party system which may not represent the interests of all Indians. There is no scope for a third party to ever win.

* Voters would vote for a party based on the personality of the presidential candidate and not on the ideology, which is against the spirit of democracy i.e. the party is bigger than the person.

* President may be from one party, but the government may be from another party with a completely different ideology, which can lead to obstructionism and policy paralysis if there is a clash of views, a phenomenon which should never occur in developing countries, where strong and consensual decisions are a must.

I think the present system is also working like Presidential rule or dictatorship. Because during election the most powerful authority of present government Prime minister was presented without following the true and democratic procedure. But here I support parliamentary form of government only.

INDIA is a well known democracy. The Indian constitution is a very strong constitution among all other countries. So instead of practicing any new form of government, efforts should be made to remove the discrepancies of the present form and bring an improvement in it because if we go for presidential form all decisions may go in one hand WHICH MAY NOT LEAD TO FRUITFUL RESULTS.

Instead efforts should be made to remove the discrepancies in the present system like by providing identity and a dignified position to a person according to his work ability and standards. There should be flexible standards made.

According to my point of view, presidential form of India is best because no one can misuse their powers. But only thing is we have to choose best one. Everything is happened by human so they should have to be alert when they are choosing person.

Presidential system is a good for India. Because India Parliament system.

All leader are corrupted. One person can take the good decision it is good for India. So this is presidential system better than parliamentary government.