Presidential v/s Parliamentary Form of Government in India

Cultural plurality is the root cause of discrimination in Indian society, due to which many states wants to be an Independent Nation to maintain the integrity of the country only parliamentary form of government is not suitable. Huge diversity in caste, sex, religion demands to increase power or independent executive but at the same time corruption which is an ace problem in India democracy make us put power over executive ie Legislative. At this time we need a quick decision-making government having the lifespan of fixed 5 years but due to the fact of Regionalism to keep a check or to make them participate in decision making. Hence in India having a vast culture the real need of successful democracy is strong judiciary and having strong laws applicable on every citizen of India.

I think the presidential form of democracy is the worst way of ruling.

Why should a single person be given all the rights its like practicing inequality within a country?

I even think so that there's no use of saying democratic if a country has this form of democracy.

I think presidential form of government is better because it fastens up the decision and execution process which ultimately reduces corruption, problems that people face and also ultimately the growth rate.

I think parliamentary form of government is better.

Presidential form of government is better. There are many corrupted politicians who eats all the money and does nothing for people. If there is a direct control by president then there would be no corruption. This type of government can help to improve country economically and politically.

I support parliamentary form of government because people and the the members of parliament itself can keep a check on the government and each other and full power is not vested in one man's hand as it is harmful and can cause dictatorship.

First of all, I want to say that India is huge population one man can't do all thing if we want development of every region so there should be a representative of that area so in my point of view Parliament is the best way to represent the actual condition of the different area.

I agree parliamentary because the reason for this is that, unlike the presidential system parliamentary system have a built -in the mechanism that allows for the easy removal of a lousy leader, who can be removed by easily in three legal ways (1) vote of confidence. (2) removal by the party. (3) removal by the hand of the state.