Ban 500, 1000 notes - Corruption Uprooted or just changing clothes!

Well, we can say that because of banning the 500 & 1000 notes there are many pros and cons both socially and personally.

If we consider socially, then I must say that the overall corruption rate have been decreased in the last two years and many people like big business tycoons who have avoided paying taxes have got their properties ceased and even their money was taken by the government.

Now let's just get into other flow, there are even many people who earned money legally and have paid their taxes in time. Buy just because of having liquid cash at their home they became helpless and could do nothing and lost all their money. But even in this case, there are some people who have political help so they got benefited. But what the point? if you want to stop corruption, it should be stopped in such a way that not even a single person who had sincerely earned should be affected, because it cost not a single life, but his family and their future.

So, I conclude by saying that although corruption rates have decreased than earlier, it isn't the way.

Hello,

From my side, I would like to ask why govt doing this?

Most of the people are ready to manage that type of problem because they know very well govt at least trying.

So why we can't support to Govt?

Hello everybody,

In my opinion, on one hand, Demonetization has partially uprooted the corruption. And as to develop any country, some decisions must be taken by the government that may not please you always but may correct the things by giving little discomfort to you. So did this "Demonetization". Up to an extent it unveiled many people's black money and still counting.

And on the other hand, in recent Lok Sabha meet when Rahul Gandhi asked Modiji about 1600 times profit made by Amit Shas"s son, Modiji was speechless. Because their own parties candidates are corrupted. So if these politicians are just doing all this for the sake of politics and their party winning the elections then it's no less than merely changing clothes.

In my opinion, it has two sides good and bad.

Good in sense that, increasing black get stuck also corruption decreased.

Bad in sense that, its major effect is on common peoples because they have to suffer from differant problems, they have to wait in long queue in ATM or bank for getting their money.

Hello friends,

In my opinion, demonization is one of the best initiative taken by Indian government till now.

Due to this no doubt, the black currency is almost uprooted but the fact is due to this the people suffered so much especially the women who saved money for difficult situations of upcoming life.

So, according to me, it had both good and bad effect on the people of our country.

In my opinion, yes it is a good decision decided by Government of India by which the people who have a lot of black money that should become out and they conscious about that they further don't such type again. Corruption also decreased. But it's demerit is people suffering a lot of problems with this demonstration. They wait for a long time at ATM for with drawing money. Only 2000 notes are available. By which many problems occur.

Hi.

I think its two sides positive and negative.

The positive side is it's the positive step against black money corruption may be its failure. But something doing better than nothing. At least govt took some action against black money.

Negative Sides is it is created a huge problem for normal people. They queued in front of the bank whole day for changes their note. Etc.

In my point of view, it is just one step to restrict the corruption. The government has to take numerous steps to uproot it. Its true, it took out all the black money from the society which was in the form of old 500 and 1000 notes. But in recent news, it is found that many people exchanged their old notes with the new notes with the help of bank managers and other brokers. They paid a lot for exchange. It was the only solution for some time. Again, the reality becomes the same as the previous. Even 2000 note is easy to hide in form of black money. It's a bad impact could be seen during the ban, it helped many people to earn in the wrong way. Till the current scenario, the ban of notes of 500 & 1000 is just changed its clothes.

From my point of view,

It is a good thinking to reduce corruption not to totally remove corruption. It is a great step to move on a right stair among most.

Yes, This is true there was not a proper technique or say facilities for a common people. And that was a demerit of this step. But this major change was really a blast for a corruption.

Thank you.

In my opinion, demonetization is the biggest leap towards the national development. Yes, the ban of 500 and 1000 Rs notes came as a shock to the Indian public, and yes, common man did face a lot of problems but we cannot ignore the fact that this decision also leads to the eradication of corruption to a very large extent if not fully. Nothing comes without a price, we had to pay the price of discomfort for a few days, but eventually good results have been seen. Now it is also true that people who are corrupted will always pave out a way for themselves, but because of this, keeping quiet and never accepting a change is not an alternative. I think a ban of currency was not a cloth changing game and even if it was, we still cannot overlook the benefits it did to the society and the corruption that it removed.