Ban 500, 1000 notes - Corruption Uprooted or just changing clothes!
Points to remember before you participate in this discussion:
- Assume you are one of the members of a real group discussion.
- Take the initiative to participate and contribute your thoughts.
- Contribute your positive thoughts towards providing the solution.
- Post your thoughts here.
Discussion:
801 comments Page 54 of 81.
Prerana said:
8 years ago
It was a good step taken by our president. I agree that during this period the common persons suffered the most. Bt still our citizens of India supported this step. It uprooted the corruption only till some extent not completely. Many corrupt people got into the picture carrying bulks of 500 - 1000 notes as black money. Our President did a good job but it affected only the middle class people who need money in their day to day life.
(6)
Mannaisathik said:
8 years ago
Hai Friends.
Am Mannai Sathik.
In my point of view, the ban of 500, 1000 notes partially uprooted the corruption. According to the government, 99% plus demonetize is back to the bank. That simply not possible without the accepting money of big businessman the plan of demonetization is already known by the people who had black money. So the plan is unsuccessful for example. A businessman contains 133 crores 2000 notes in his house.
Am Mannai Sathik.
In my point of view, the ban of 500, 1000 notes partially uprooted the corruption. According to the government, 99% plus demonetize is back to the bank. That simply not possible without the accepting money of big businessman the plan of demonetization is already known by the people who had black money. So the plan is unsuccessful for example. A businessman contains 133 crores 2000 notes in his house.
(3)
Jithu said:
8 years ago
The Word Demonetization is surfed in google by most of all to know the meaning. Hope later we all physically experienced the meaning of the same by out of cash at ATM queues. Predominantly It shakes our market share @ global market. Entire Nation was encouraged for such brave move by PM to avoid Black money & corruption. But the end result says 99% of Rs 500-1000 Notes collected by RBI reports. So where is the black Money? Now.
(7)
Vivek Kumar said:
8 years ago
Hello Everyone,
We all had seen that poor and middle-class peoples stand in queues for exchanging their notes but I think demonetization if for them who had black money. So the middle-class peoples suffer a lot without having black money and politician, businessman and other culprits are able to exchange their money without standing in queues and in a democratic country a single person like PM can't take any decision on their own.
We all had seen that poor and middle-class peoples stand in queues for exchanging their notes but I think demonetization if for them who had black money. So the middle-class peoples suffer a lot without having black money and politician, businessman and other culprits are able to exchange their money without standing in queues and in a democratic country a single person like PM can't take any decision on their own.
(13)
Niya said:
7 years ago
Hello All.
Banning 500 and 1000 Rupees Note over a night is really a stupid thing, PM and other top millionaires and billionaires were already knows about it all the other people like us suffered a lot problems and anyway black money will never be going to be demolished even though they release new currency notes surely there will be a black money for that currency also its a useless thing which government had ever done it before.
Banning 500 and 1000 Rupees Note over a night is really a stupid thing, PM and other top millionaires and billionaires were already knows about it all the other people like us suffered a lot problems and anyway black money will never be going to be demolished even though they release new currency notes surely there will be a black money for that currency also its a useless thing which government had ever done it before.
(25)
Snehalata Behera said:
7 years ago
In my opinion, yes it is a good decision decided by Government of India by which the people who have a lot of black money that should become out and they conscious about that they further don't such type again. Corruption also decreased. But it's demerit is people suffering a lot of problems with this demonstration. They wait for a long time at ATM for with drawing money. Only 2000 notes are available. By which many problems occur.
(8)
Zeus said:
8 years ago
I do not think that by simply demonetising higher denomination currency can uproot corruption.
It may have halted the extent of corruption temporarily. Because of lions shares of black assets in.
India was in non-liquid forms.
Secondly, most of the black money are illegally stashed in offshores tax heavens, as we know it.
From Panama Paper leak.
Thirdly, counterfeit notes may have temporarily stopped but it will emerge again.
It may have halted the extent of corruption temporarily. Because of lions shares of black assets in.
India was in non-liquid forms.
Secondly, most of the black money are illegally stashed in offshores tax heavens, as we know it.
From Panama Paper leak.
Thirdly, counterfeit notes may have temporarily stopped but it will emerge again.
(4)
Divya said:
8 years ago
What I feel is that in the present situation, it has been useful because it has discouraged black money by preventing corruption but in the longer run the same corruption is going to repeat again and again some way or the other. So, the govt should take more care to prevent corruption by banning these notes and producing newer ones from time to time and better method should be introduced for the ppl to exchange their notes easily.
(17)
Mani said:
8 years ago
According to my point of view, the banning of these notes has two perspectives.
The best part is the growth of Indian economy which had achieved a GDP of 7.6% from 7% and removal of fake currencies in which big shots were involved.
The bad thing is about common people who are suffering from the effect of demonetisation which included bank terms.
But in a long run, this decision would make India grow economically more powerful.
The best part is the growth of Indian economy which had achieved a GDP of 7.6% from 7% and removal of fake currencies in which big shots were involved.
The bad thing is about common people who are suffering from the effect of demonetisation which included bank terms.
But in a long run, this decision would make India grow economically more powerful.
(12)
Rajesh yadav said:
8 years ago
So guys I think to fight against terrorism is more important then fight against corruption because I think all are aware that how the Kashmiri terrorist are giving the money to the Kashmiri citizens to throw the stones on the militants and they had the huge Indian currency and they were also buying the weapons from this currency so as our PM changed the Indian currency. That terrorist doesn't have the money to fight for Kashmir.
(9)
Post your thoughts here:
Quick links
Quantitative Aptitude
Verbal (English)
Reasoning
Programming
Interview
Placement Papers