Ban 500, 1000 notes - Corruption Uprooted or just changing clothes!
Points to remember before you participate in this discussion:
- Assume you are one of the members of a real group discussion.
- Take the initiative to participate and contribute your thoughts.
- Contribute your positive thoughts towards providing the solution.
- Post your thoughts here.
Discussion:
801 comments Page 43 of 81.
Pathan Shahebaz said:
8 years ago
Hello everyone,
According to me, it was a good decision taken by the government But when it was implemented, it didn't succeed.
I think there was a lack of proper planning before implementing this idea.
According to me, if it was planned proper and implemented in a proper way, then it would have succeeded more and the people who faced money problems during this period wouldn't have faced such issues.
By the way, it reduced some rate of corruption and I found that govt. Is taking good steps regarding growth, development and economy of a country.
According to me, it was a good decision taken by the government But when it was implemented, it didn't succeed.
I think there was a lack of proper planning before implementing this idea.
According to me, if it was planned proper and implemented in a proper way, then it would have succeeded more and the people who faced money problems during this period wouldn't have faced such issues.
By the way, it reduced some rate of corruption and I found that govt. Is taking good steps regarding growth, development and economy of a country.
(15)
Vivek said:
8 years ago
Hi everyone,
According to me, the decision taken by our government is somehow beneficial in eradicating corruption to some extent. Not entire, but some of the black money is retrieved and the corrupt people had to suffer a lot during that phase of demonetization. But the negative side of the demonetization was that middle class and lower class people suffered a lot as it was an inconvenience for them to stand in the queue and exchange the money from the bank. People took the leave or manage their timings from their job in order to exchange money.
According to me, the decision taken by our government is somehow beneficial in eradicating corruption to some extent. Not entire, but some of the black money is retrieved and the corrupt people had to suffer a lot during that phase of demonetization. But the negative side of the demonetization was that middle class and lower class people suffered a lot as it was an inconvenience for them to stand in the queue and exchange the money from the bank. People took the leave or manage their timings from their job in order to exchange money.
(3)
Nil said:
7 years ago
Banning the 500 & 1000 notes is really a great initiative taken by Indian government. It's will not be uprooted the corruption fully but made the corruption hard to do at all levels. It's an alarm by the Indian government to the black money holder that the days are coming so harder day by day. Afterall currency is also on a way to lapse as the initiative of digital India program promotes the cashless Indian economy. So, the day is not far when the each and every money will be accounted for by the government. And era of corruption will go down.
(7)
Pratiksha hasure said:
7 years ago
Hello everyone,
According to me, every thing has two sides one of them is good and another is bad, so ban on 500 and 1000 notes these rule also have to sides.
Now first point of view, its very good decision taken by government to ban on 500, 1000 notes thats why there will be control on corrupted people and much more corruption Also be control.
But in other hand common people has to suffered much more problems. So according to me government provide first alternate option to people and then only they have to make this type of rule.
Thank you!
According to me, every thing has two sides one of them is good and another is bad, so ban on 500 and 1000 notes these rule also have to sides.
Now first point of view, its very good decision taken by government to ban on 500, 1000 notes thats why there will be control on corrupted people and much more corruption Also be control.
But in other hand common people has to suffered much more problems. So according to me government provide first alternate option to people and then only they have to make this type of rule.
Thank you!
(12)
Samm said:
9 years ago
First of all, good morning all of you. In my opinion, PM Modi taken decision about demonitization is very good. It helps the country growth economical level, in our India, there are so many peoples not paying their taxes, and corruption happens so that the good decision to make our country economically strong. I know because of this person suffering a lot they do not withdraw the cash as they want and also the poor people not understanding the online transaction but this problem will occur only few days but pain (corruption) is cure permanently.
(7)
Parveen kumar said:
9 years ago
Ban of 500 and 1000 notes plays a vital role to remove black money from our country.
Changes are. Must for anything.
Really it took many time for Indian government to take such type of step.
Many people of India reserve more money as a black money and no body know how much they are hidden so by doing such type of task back money could erupt and everyone know very well.
But one. More thing that every once ban of such notes required periodically because again people goes reserve their money by knowing that no more government action will take.
Changes are. Must for anything.
Really it took many time for Indian government to take such type of step.
Many people of India reserve more money as a black money and no body know how much they are hidden so by doing such type of task back money could erupt and everyone know very well.
But one. More thing that every once ban of such notes required periodically because again people goes reserve their money by knowing that no more government action will take.
(7)
Trushali said:
8 years ago
Banning 500, 1000 notes become just like changing clothes. This rule made by Modi Hi is very beneficial for decreasing the corruption but it is not managed in right way. Because of these change the general people in India they were suffering. To change something the difficulty is valid But there must be some system like there must be a system which could manage the queue And also the queue should give an idea about Which queue is less or which queue is longer. By applying these methods there may be not Any problems for general people to suffer.
(5)
Deepti arya said:
8 years ago
According to me, as we know a coin has its two faces one is head and the other is the tail. Demonetisation also has some advantages and disadvantages. If we really want to see our India corruption less we have to give our contribution as the government is taking so many steps such as banning 500-1000 notes and GST to make our India corruption less. The decision of demonetization is an initiative and the purpose behind this decision was bring out the black money and make India cashless which is essential if we want to see our country developed.
(36)
Jignesh chauhan said:
7 years ago
As per my view, demonetization is one step of gov. To reduce the corruption from the nation although it is not implement properly still due to which we get lots of changes in our nation like lots of black money holders came out.
India going towards digitalization around 67 to 100 crore people and many fake companies get captured increase in the amount of taxpayer as well as fake currency also get in lots of amounts. As we can see these all advantages in front of it some disadvantage like people has to stand in a queue. And all are negligible.
India going towards digitalization around 67 to 100 crore people and many fake companies get captured increase in the amount of taxpayer as well as fake currency also get in lots of amounts. As we can see these all advantages in front of it some disadvantage like people has to stand in a queue. And all are negligible.
(6)
Rekha said:
8 years ago
Corruption is something that cannot be uprooted. This is the unbelievable truth. Yes! It can be shaken a little. Banning 500 and 1000 notes did make some politicians and other famous people amaze and at the same time put them in a situation to protect them or else see themselves in jail with their black money. But if this ban was kept in mind to uproot the corruption then it was a failure not the total failure. The common people were only affected at higher percentage. What the government did was good but it required a proper implementation.
(6)
Post your thoughts here:
Quick links
Quantitative Aptitude
Verbal (English)
Reasoning
Programming
Interview
Placement Papers