Ban 500, 1000 notes - Corruption Uprooted or just changing clothes!
Points to remember before you participate in this discussion:
- Assume you are one of the members of a real group discussion.
- Take the initiative to participate and contribute your thoughts.
- Contribute your positive thoughts towards providing the solution.
- Post your thoughts here.
Discussion:
801 comments Page 18 of 81.
Hassic said:
7 years ago
Yeah of course, demonetization doesn't affect the corruption casual corruption is running. There is no any change. So it uses full for the corrupters and culprits to do their illegal activities easily.
(5)
ARUN said:
7 years ago
Demonetization nothing effected to corruption, and it helps more to bank and govt employees only. Only middle-class people suffered due to demonetization. Govt raised demonetization for a highlight purpose otherwise nothing happened after demonetization no corrupted list released. Moreover, old notes are good.
(13)
Edwin said:
7 years ago
Hi friends, our topic of discussion is demonetisation uproot corruption or not. I am strongly says that demonetisation in India doesn't do anything to corruption. Because according to the RBI report about 97 % of banned currency returns to them. It indicates that the black money holder whiten thier money very easily with the help of our government. During the process of cash exchanges so many bank and the respective officers help the corrupted persons with bribe.
Demonetisation causes so many negative effects to the Indian economy. After the declaration of bann of currency the flow of money in the market ceases. It causes the GDP of India to fall. So many daily wage workers lost their job. Simply saying the India totaly collapsed after demonstration.
Demonetisation was one good thing but it do not implement well in India. So the corruption remains unaffected after banning of currency.
Thank you.
Demonetisation causes so many negative effects to the Indian economy. After the declaration of bann of currency the flow of money in the market ceases. It causes the GDP of India to fall. So many daily wage workers lost their job. Simply saying the India totaly collapsed after demonstration.
Demonetisation was one good thing but it do not implement well in India. So the corruption remains unaffected after banning of currency.
Thank you.
(60)
Vidyadhar shelke said:
7 years ago
I think, not affect on corruption because. On this planet, MAN is very intelligent. If one door is closed, open another door, like same happen in this situation. If corruption is not possible through money, they can take Buy something Big amounts goods, Invest somewhere without cash. I agree corruption had been stopped only that period. When Notes had been changed.
(10)
Anomiii said:
7 years ago
Demonetization took place three times in Indian history, the last tym it took place on 1974 nd after that on midnight of 8 nov 2016. It was not at all an easy decision for our pm to make. Even he knew people would be facing lots and lots of problem, but there was no other option, it was to be done suddenly at once because if he mentions before a month, that such a decision is to be taken, the whole process would go in complete vain. Bt what was good to see was that our complete nation accepted it with a warm heart. There were no strikes, no burning of vehicles and tires nor blockage of the road. It is the law of nature every action has both positive and negative aspect. Yeah, we faced lots of problems, there were long queues in front of ATMs and banks but we common people realized that this is one of the most important step taken by our respect pm sir against corruption. India is a type of country which can't be a 100% corruption free but it can be removed up to a great extent, which our pm Modi sir has tried to do.
(13)
Shiva swamy said:
7 years ago
Demonetization announced by our PM Modi sir saying that banned of 500/- and 1000/- rupees notes and introducing the new currency. The main aim of the govt to make the India corruption free country to increase the cashless transactions to make digital India. Lot's of people support this decision and few of people not support as they have black money and initially it is painful for poor and middle-class people but it will few days only and everything will fine. Personally, I think that it is a very good decision by the government but it's success highly depends on implementation and I appeal every Indian to support this decision and contribute to it.
Thank you.
Thank you.
(9)
Sudhanshu Kumar said:
7 years ago
Hi friends, according to me, demonetization is a good step taken by our government, but not implemented properly. I accept that many middle-class family and poor have to face a lot of problems. But we know that without pain nothing gain. So if we want to control corruption then we have to face some difficulties. In a short time, we can't change any anything. Our government is taking many steps to control corruption and demonetization is one of them.
(37)
Aparna said:
7 years ago
The answer to this question is Yes and No!
Yes, corruption has been controlled but No it has not been uprooted completely.
Corruption can not be uprooted by merely one or two steps because it's deeply embedded in our system but yes it can be curtailed to sone extent. Demonetization has at least pulled the people to the banks and by that I mean more number of digital transaction. It was a quite a warning signal for the cash-rich society of India who was forced to throw bags full of notes on road. But those who had brains with money managed to deport cash either to the Swiss bank or through some under the table management. In short corruption continues to exist in one or the other way but the proportion in which it was increasing has declined.
Yes, corruption has been controlled but No it has not been uprooted completely.
Corruption can not be uprooted by merely one or two steps because it's deeply embedded in our system but yes it can be curtailed to sone extent. Demonetization has at least pulled the people to the banks and by that I mean more number of digital transaction. It was a quite a warning signal for the cash-rich society of India who was forced to throw bags full of notes on road. But those who had brains with money managed to deport cash either to the Swiss bank or through some under the table management. In short corruption continues to exist in one or the other way but the proportion in which it was increasing has declined.
(25)
B.logendhiran said:
7 years ago
According to me, I believe that banning the 500, 1000 notes is a stupid idea. Because our black money was stored in Swiss bank. The Indian government should take those amount under control and punished the investor of black money in the Swiss bank.
Changing the notes cannot be reduced corruption. It was the psychology of Indian people, they should change their mind and should opposite the corruption.
Changing the notes cannot be reduced corruption. It was the psychology of Indian people, they should change their mind and should opposite the corruption.
(17)
Hemanttt said:
8 years ago
Hello friends,
We know change is always necessary. But we have to view both prospectives. The change gives advantages such as new technology, new experience and many more. Also have cons such as miss use, an economical burden.
As per my point of view when anyone trying to change a system then they should aware of the effects and solutions for different problems. When notes are banned by the government they are not at all aware of side effects from that. Actually, government systems are not prepared for such quick decision. Also, many non-literate people are. Apart from this students also faces many issues regarding college fees, accommodation fees etc. If government preplan all the event before the time it may result in a good growth of the economy.
As my point of view, the government failed to achieve the desired goal.
Thank you!
We know change is always necessary. But we have to view both prospectives. The change gives advantages such as new technology, new experience and many more. Also have cons such as miss use, an economical burden.
As per my point of view when anyone trying to change a system then they should aware of the effects and solutions for different problems. When notes are banned by the government they are not at all aware of side effects from that. Actually, government systems are not prepared for such quick decision. Also, many non-literate people are. Apart from this students also faces many issues regarding college fees, accommodation fees etc. If government preplan all the event before the time it may result in a good growth of the economy.
As my point of view, the government failed to achieve the desired goal.
Thank you!
(12)
Post your thoughts here:
Quick links
Quantitative Aptitude
Verbal (English)
Reasoning
Programming
Interview
Placement Papers