Aptitude - Numbers - Discussion

Discussion Forum : Numbers - General Questions (Q.No. 3)
3.
It is being given that (232 + 1) is completely divisible by a whole number. Which of the following numbers is completely divisible by this number?
(216 + 1)
(216 - 1)
(7 x 223)
(296 + 1)
Answer: Option
Explanation:

Let 232 = x. Then, (232 + 1) = (x + 1).

Let (x + 1) be completely divisible by the natural number N. Then,

(296 + 1) = [(232)3 + 1] = (x3 + 1) = (x + 1)(x2 - x + 1), which is completely divisible by N, since (x + 1) is divisible by N.

Discussion:
137 comments Page 5 of 14.

Sandeep kumar jangir said:   1 decade ago
2^32 = x.
So (2^32+1) = x+1.

And option A, B n C have less power compared to given value.
So 2^96 = 2^(32*3). Which is completely divisible by 2^32.

AnonymousType said:   1 decade ago
2^32 + 1 = 4294967297 = 641 * 6700417.

Now [A] (2^16+1) = 65537 is a prime.

[B] (2^16-1) = 3*5*17*257.

[C] (7*2^23) only is divisible by 7 and a bunch of even numbers.

[D] (2^96+1) = 79228162514264337593543950337 = 641 * 6700417 * 18446744069414584321.

So there.

Deepa said:   1 decade ago
How can we know (x^3+1) is divisible by n?

Deependra said:   1 decade ago
It is very easy question guys. Try again to understand the logic of mathematics which applied in this problem.

Satyajit chakraborty said:   1 decade ago
Simply remember this:

(a^n +b^n) is always divisible by same value of 'a' and 'b' if 'n' is odd in number. Here 'n' denotes power of a number.

Soumya said:   1 decade ago
(2^32+1).

Take x = 2^32, Then (2^32+1) = (x+1) ------> Eq1.

2^96 = (2^32) ^3, ie x^3.

Then (2^96+1) = (x^3+1).

We know that.

(x^3+1) = (x+1) (x^2-x+1) ------> Eq2.

Then dividing eq2 by eq1.

(x+1) (x^2-x+1) / (x+1) = (x^2-x+1).

If we give any value to x we get only natural numbers.

B.nandu said:   1 decade ago
2^32+1 is divisible by all whole numbers.

So here we multiply the power of 32 with whole numbers. i.e,

32 x 1=32.
32 x 2=64.
32 x 3=96.

We have this option 96. So 2696+1 is correct one.

Nani said:   1 decade ago
Why we don't consider (x^2 - x + 1)?

Chethanya said:   1 decade ago
Please explain in simple method, because I'm from arts background.

Ram said:   1 decade ago
I can't understand.


Post your comments here:

Your comments will be displayed after verification.