Points to remember before you participate in this discussion:
|Prerana said: (Apr 4, 2017)|
|No doubt. It is been accepted by our society that basic necessities of our life are food, clothing and shelter. Ethics is equally important to food. But nowadays, the importance of ethics is fading, you get to see so many crimes in our society. Murders, kidnapping, robbery. Most of the time the reason of such crime is money. In such situations its hard to say that ethics comes first then food. We say Man is a social animal. We eat to live not live to eat. We earn and we eat, but animals the case is different.|
|Shashank Gehlot said: (Feb 14, 2017)|
|As per Freud's theory of human needs, the first stage is food, shelter and cloth and then comes the other needs. A man has to first work for his survival and other basic needs which include ethics. If man has fulfilled first stage of his need then comes moral duties in the society in which he lives to keep healthy environment and peace. Ethics is also important because if a man do not have ethics he will indulge in theft, stealing of food, robbery for his survival which will be harmful to the society and human existence will be jeopardanized. For example, if we analyse the economy of japan than we will notice that after world war2 the country was defeated and its economy was shattered but people of japan do not give up and with the available resources of food, cloth and shelter and discipline in work raised the country among top of the economy of the world. So both food and ethics play crucial role in a man's life but food comes first before ethics.|
|Anoop Ojha said: (Feb 4, 2017)|
|According to me, food will always be coming first from ethics. Because as we know that all humans are to the world to doing some work and spend their life happy. For doing work and spending happy life we require energy to do work so life will spend happily. By the principle of law of conservation of energy, we required some previously maintained energy which obviously comes from food. That's why food comes first, as we satisfied we with basic need we concentrate on secondary need that is society. In which each human has its own prospective and living manner. To maintaining this we required ethical values. Therefore food comes first ethics later.|
|Anu said: (Sep 28, 2016)|
|Hai friends, here our topic is about food and ethics.
According to me, whatever work we do is only for getting food for feeding ourselves. Its basic criteria for all humans. After fulfilling our basic needs. We should follow our ethics. Of course, ethics is also a basic of survival in society.
|Nayana Kharatmal. said: (Aug 27, 2016)|
|Hi, friends, as we all know that " food & ethics " are just like two eyes of the face. Both food and ethics are important for human to survive in life or in society. Food is the basic need for a human. When we follow the ethics then we definitely get food. Without food you can't live so I agree that food comes first, ethics later.
In daily life, we are working just for our basic needs like food, shelter & cloths. After basic need, we think about the ethics. Then we follow the ethics.
And, I totally agree with you @Harpreet. Our today life is very practical and we need the energy to survive in life. And whole energy is getting from the food, not from ethics. So food comes first then Ethics.
|Ashlesha said: (Apr 4, 2016)|
|First of all, we are human beings. Yes, Food is the basic necessity for survival. Without proper food, we would be dying instead. We earn our living to serve our families with healthy food. But we don't roam here and there stealing the food we need, isn't it?
We are wiser than animals because of our ethical thinking and values. Values and ethics are created for our own well being and sound healthy living. Take an example we consume food from plants, but as a part of ethics, we also plant trees for a new life. So a human being is well equipped to find his bread along with maintaining the ethical values. We also care for our mother earth as a social responsibility. If every human being thinks in an ethical way for survival. Society will ease at peace.
If a hungry man strives hard for his food. He will definitely get it. Every time adopting unethical ways to get the food degrades the society.
After all an old saying goes as, 'A small morsel of bread was equally shared by seven rats'.
So ethical thinking opens so many doors for a better life, satisfaction and happiness.
|Maz said: (Mar 16, 2016)|
It depends on how the situation indulges a common person in different fragments of life, In modern society, its obligatory on every being to respect other customs and cultures, India is a country with an enormous variety of foods and every group has own ethical values, being a countrymen one must consider the ethics and accordingly consume the foods.
|Shipra Shukla said: (Nov 27, 2015)|
|According to me, this topic is actually trying to point towards a very burning news now-a-days and i.e. "ban on beef". Because it's a food for some communities in India whereas it's related to ethics for the others. Lets be specific about the two biggest communities of our country where the Muslims supports beef consumption but the Hindus are against it because of their moral values or ethics. But let's also not forget that our constitution supports freedom to eat and live freely as we are breathing in a democratic country.|
|Saikumar said: (Oct 14, 2015)|
|Hi friends here Ethics and food have their own Importance.
For a Poor or a hungry man Food is the main thing to be fulfilled. He hunts for whatever way he can find it. It also depends on the character of the person if he wants to get that in nice way by putting ethical values in mind by giving respect to the society where we live.
It depends however Ethics are like the back bone of the society if a person who is rich or having basic requirements which a person should have he definitely like to be good. Because no one wants to be bad in the society.
|Dharmendra Dangi said: (Oct 13, 2015)|
|Food or ethics?
According to me food play a vital role in surviving. But we are human not animal. Many of freedom fighters died for us. They has gave their life's for us. They fought for ethics.
They was wanted freedom. If there was food primary thing then, our nation wouldn't be independent. Though food is basic need but if it come from by hard work it would be more testy then if it would be come by begging.
|Amit Pandit said: (Oct 10, 2015)|
|I think we should give priority to the ethics because we humans eat so that we can live, we do not live to eat. The only thing which defers human from animals are these ethics. A long life without ethics is useless and a short life with ethics and values is incredible.|
|Pratibha Dhodi said: (Sep 1, 2015)|
To revive food need food, To earn food you need ethics, To get ethics you have to survive.
In this way in different situation you have to give preference to food & ethics because both of are depends on each other.
|Hitendra said: (Aug 22, 2015)|
I think this is absolutely correct statement. If person is hungry, his eyes and mind always try to find out food to fill his stomach. He will keep his ethics in side until he get food. But if he is not starving he will try to upgrade his ethic value in society. He will make some creative thinking, innovation in his work which could increases his ethic value.
|Khusboo Giri said: (Jul 27, 2015)|
|The man is a social animal. The man born in the earth. He has fulfill has all needs himself his first needs food. He has to arrange his food. He work and search his food. The quoted line"food comes first ethics latter".|
|Surbhi said: (May 29, 2015)|
|Ethics plays an important role to get recognized in the society. But food comes first. Food is the basic (psychological) need of human being. If he is starving then he will become weak or unhealthy and an unhealthy person dies daily.
Once his basic needs (food, shelter, clothing) are fulfilled then he will get motivated to fulfill his higher level needs (such as ethics etc).
|Manjary said: (May 21, 2015)|
|I agree with this. If your tummy is full you look civilized, educated and well personality. Your mind is satisfied and if you are creative and balanced, your mind provoke you to do well things. Hence, ethics is shown in your work. If your tummy is empty, how can you satisfy your mind. Hence, you shows your anger for that situation and to overcome that situation you will do all works which are unethical.|
|Mehak said: (Apr 12, 2015)|
|Yes. I too think that food comes first, ethics later. As said even by our elders "HEALTH IS WEALTH". If we are not well (physically or mentally) , how can we be able to interact with others, do and manage our work effectively or participate actively in any event? So, in my view, it is the food that must be given preference over the ethics.|
|Hema said: (Mar 17, 2015)|
This is Hema. I agree to some extent that food comes first, ethics next. Food is the basic need for all. And we people earning by some means just to fill our bellies. How much we strive hard, its only to satisfy our hunger.
We should not earn by illegal methods. Hunger drives us to commit to the worst situations. But we should mostly see that in this search process we should not commit ourselves to immoral acts.
|Khushbooasawa said: (Feb 11, 2015)|
|For me, food does not come first but ethics. If we do not want to sound ethical, breathe ethical, live ethical, then what is the use of education? For food aka money, we can steal, we can beg, then why to waste both energy and time in learning the a basics of life. Ethics is the gap between what we call a civilized person and a non civilized person.|
|Kalpana said: (Jan 3, 2015)|
|For me ethics comes first because there is no use of surviving. We need to live our life. We can take example of freedom fighters like Bhagat Singh who have not taken food for several days in prison because he wanted free India.
There are several examples where human being have given there life for ethics. There is no use of merely surviving. We should live our life. If everyone is ethical there is no problem in the system.
|Abhinav Tripathi said: (Dec 9, 2014)|
|Friend as per my views, food comes first because ethics come from peace and constant mind and one needs proper feeding to think about it which a hungry man don't has. So he is not able to judge what is ethical or not. Hence good food is paramount to think better.|
|Ravi Barnwal said: (Nov 16, 2014)|
|Food comes 1st. Is it? We are not animals, we are Human.
Just consider an example - when Maharana Pratap were in jungle, her daughter had two rotis of grass in which she gave one to his younger brother even she were too hungry. If food comes first then she had theft of his brother. So I think we should be ethical otherwise food can get be get under gunpoint and we will be animal in the face of human.
|Ezzie said: (Nov 9, 2014)|
|Food and ethics are equally important for human society. Otherwise we would be just animals.
So many responses say that food comes first because it is necessary for survival. That sounds noble and we may maintain that view until we are on the receiving end; For example, when a hungry, desperate man, with a weapon, a gun maybe, has entered our home.
We would want that hungry man to have some principle, some ethics; to respect our lives, the lives of our loved ones, to respect our right to our property. We would want that hungry man to act with principle, to ask first rather than to take; to think it below him to steal, in spite of his hunger.
Food and ethics are equally important. Otherwise we would be living in a jungle.
|Sai Sarvani said: (Oct 18, 2014)|
|I agree with the statement food comes first but at the same time ethics are also important because without ethics we'll be even like a terrorist or murderer or a sadist or we can even do corruption then what is the use of this birth? everyone wants to lead their life very happily but is it write getting happiness in a wrong way? I don't think so. So both food and ethics are important for every life.|
|Punith Apaji said: (Oct 9, 2014)|
I agree the statement that the food comes first and the ethics later as we seen in real world so many of peoples are from poor background and some of them are lack food and other facilities but they are having utmost IQ brain power, hence the government should take the responsibility of these people and should give basic needs, they are mainly from the backward categories so government has to provide basic needs to such people and let them to give contribution to the improvement of our nation.
|Saurabh said: (Sep 21, 2014)|
|Ethics and food are the two sides of a coin. If you talk about the ethic of a person who is hungry and searching for food his ethics can't help him out. Because our ethics can't fulfill the hungry stomach of a person. Hence food comes first than the ethics. Food is the basic need of a human being.|
|Priyanshu said: (Aug 31, 2014)|
|How can ethics and morals supercede the basic requirement of a man?
An empty stomach is a root cause of deviation from all morality. Why animal began to kill another animal:not because of his safety but because of his food requirement. It is the food scarcity that gives birth to major unfair elements of society like robbery, stealing and even killing. We do not witness these things much in a rich country. When there is money in hand, there is a sound presence of healthy mind. People can then work upon to improve their code of conduct, their behaviour etc. Ethics are important to control the greed of man when he intends to adopt unfair means to interfere into another man's daily bread and butter. Yaar, we should live and let others live more peacefully. Our country is self sufficient in food and grain production. But important thing is that there is no proper flow of grains from top level to bottom level. Make them to reach every home so that beggars can be satisfied and feel healthier to do hard work and make their living by ethical means.
|Mansih Kumar said: (Aug 21, 2014)|
|According to me I totally agree with this statement that food comes first and ethics later.
Its because food becomes the primary need of each and every human being today.
If there is food then ethic comes and if there is no food then there are no ethics.
|Raghav said: (Aug 14, 2014)|
|In my opinion food comes first and ethics later because in today's life there are three basic amenities required for survival of any person and these are food, cloth and shelter. Out of these three food is most important one. When it comes for food then no one see any ethics there because ethics is related to individual behaviour. If any have everything in his life(money) then they follow their ethics then they thinks about their behaviour and change the way of living and do everything which comes in their etics.|
|Suraj Rizal said: (Aug 9, 2014)|
Stomach think and stomach speak when it is empty I don't think any ethics will come there. I concur that food, clothes and shelter are the basis necessity to live our life when the person don't possess all this things then he won't care about ethics at all. Learning ethics will consider only and only after we have enough food to satisfy our stomach. With empty stomach you will never think about anything else you will be just emphasizing where will you get the food from. Just whenever you come across some beggar ask him do he care about ethics never because beggar never speak, always you will find that his stomach is speaking. Not most I think almost first everything we do in life is to have sufficient food in our life then only we will think about other comfort and then ethics. So my conclusion is that food comes first then ethics and all that.
|Rimjhimbothra said: (Jul 28, 2014)|
|Ethics are the moral values which are being taught since childhood. Ethics does play important role but in real life it is hardly followed by some individual. Ethics are calculated within ourselves then also we do wrong thing like we are aware of the traffic rules but then also some breaks, we are aware that robbery is wrong deed but then also we do some by habit and some by need. In this world first come is always served first. But a person who do not possess to have food two times what he will do with ethics.|
|Shiv said: (Jun 27, 2014)|
According to my opinion foods comes first then Ethics. Because food is the basic need of a human being. If we don't follow the ethics then we can live longer but if we don't take food then we can't live more than 15 days.
We can see the effect of Food on people who lives in slum areas and who has not sufficient money to fill their stomach twice a day.
These people don't think that we are bothering something they start to walk in wrong ways like to murder someone.
It all happens to fulfill their stomach or to get money.
So we can say that a person doesn't think about ethics when he is hungry.
|Krishno said: (Apr 14, 2014)|
|Well my dear friends,
According to me food comes first. If you are hungry you won't have the power to think what is ethical and what is not. We always see peoples committing crimes, like murdering someone, or looting and we say that those peoples do not posses any ethics. Same time we some time blame prostitutes of making money out of selling their body.
But we should think why is he/she doing that. No one want to be criminal. Actually poverty make them. When call comes from our stomach we forget every thing.
So I want to say ethics are important but not more than food.
|Sonakshi said: (Apr 3, 2014)|
|Surely food is the basic need of human being. If a person is hungry he will not be able to give his or her 100% to a work he does even forgetting about the ethics he or she has. Ethics are important for a human but after food which is far important for survival.|
|Raghavendar said: (Mar 5, 2014)|
|Sex workers sell themselves to get their daily loaf of bread. Prostitution is considered a sin, but they do it to fill their stomach. "Food comes first, ethics later" would be the thought running in their mind whenever their profession is questioned.|
|Devendra Singh said: (Jan 30, 2014)|
|Hi friends, I feel that 'food comes first than ethics' because when a person, who is very tired & hungry, needs food as primary need not ethics. When no-one will alive then what will be the need ethics.
We know ethics is very necessary to live us as human being. But it should come after the food.
|Sakar Elias said: (Jan 21, 2014)|
|I agree, because a human being can't live without food. Every people working for making money, money is making for food. Without food and water there is no ethics, ethics coming from living peoples, and not from dead peoples. A healthy body would have a healthy brain.|
|Gauravgaur said: (Nov 19, 2013)|
|Ethics make man, but food destroy man.
According to me ethics come first because it will manage your digestive system very well but by excess food you can't manage your digestive system by food ethics will improve your personality and set up your mind according to your work and help us to perform work very well.
|Sourabh said: (Nov 12, 2013)|
|According to me ethics comes first.
If every one follows ethical mean there will be no problems in the system.
Unethical means is root cause of every problem.
Even the dog comes near us when they are hungry they never bite and snatch our food.
If from top level to bottom level ethics followed first there will be no corruption, inflation, unemployment.
|Nisar said: (Sep 25, 2013)|
|Dear Friends, I agree with Food comes first, Then all comes next, Just think with out but with ethics a man can live for how many days But we can live longer with out ethics with food for longer days.
Ethics is not the must one to follow, If we had enough food, Somehow the ethics should follow us. The God created a whole world for us to eat well and enjoy.
|Sunil said: (Sep 19, 2013)|
|Nothing is good or bad on this earth. But the thinking makes so. Food, water and shelter are the bare minimum requirements for any human beings on this earth. Ethics are only for good people and that is something Kinda an inborn quality and about the bad guys it is simple non existent. But to live in this highly civilized world.
We do require ethics. I suppose, you all will agree the point that ethics can only be followed when one is alive. And the later is only possible if one is able to satisfy his basic necessity of food and water. So, practically. The statement 'Food Comes First, Ethics Later' holds true. But, as I earlier told it is debatable considering the type of person.
|Ankush said: (Sep 14, 2013)|
|We should keep balance between food and ethics as much as we could do but if we are being strict on the topic I personally believe that food should come first because that is basic need. Survival is right of every human being. You can talk about ethics when your stomach is filled.|
|Saidurga said: (Sep 7, 2013)|
|Well, I agree that food comes first and ethics later. Food is the basic need for the living beings to survive. No living being on this great earth doesn't have any ethics. They will search for food and they survive regardless of the way it obtained the food.
But it is import to note that man had became the supreme living being on this great earth because of his enormous intelligence. But the ethics make his existence for billions of years.
"NO FOOD NO SURVIVAL, BUT NO ETHICS NO LONGER SURVIVAL".
|Vamsi said: (Aug 8, 2013)|
|Hi, friends we all know that food is one of the basic needs for human survival, in fact not only humans but all the creatures that exist in this world. Without ethics also we can live but it is just like an animal. So both should go hand in hand to live like a human being.|
|Tinku Prasad said: (Aug 6, 2013)|
|Obviously Food comes first. Ethics are the moral principles which control or influence individuals behavior. All these moral principles were formed gradually to give directions to society, for well-being of society.
Think of first person who came on this planet, first thing he would have search for is food, he had not mind killing animal for food. After that he thought of anything else ex. Forming society and rules etc. If there is no society there will not be any ethics and society first need to feed its people first.
Likewise if government is not able to feed its people, people will obviously go violent.
Criminals mostly are the people who had suffered with poverty, helplessness and could not bear the injustice done by government to them.
|Guile said: (Jul 22, 2013)|
|Of course both food and ethics are very very crucial for a healthy society. But if the question is 'WHAT COMES FIRST?', I would just request you to conduct a small social experiment.
Look at that young girl who looks malnourished because she has never had enough to fill her stomach. Her skin is burnt and her feet bruised because she has been begging all day with her younger brother in her arms at the traffic signal you cross everyday. Look at her in the eye and ask her if she cares more about her daddy's work ethics or about the food he manages to bring home that is barely enough for them to survive.
I won't answer this question. Let her do it.
|Brajesh said: (Jul 22, 2013)|
|In my opinion food comes and will comes first than ethics. When you don't have the source of survival that is food you would not go for maintaining or system your own status for better, good or kind appearance.
For example in the starting of civilization man's character were surviving for food type but as the civilization developed then the so called religion, government, system comes into the picture.
Thus food comes first and ethics later, but nowadays it also depends upon the individuals as all of you said.
|Rahul Kumar said: (Jul 18, 2013)|
|Food or ethics? If you ask this anyone will say definitely food is necessary for survival but then for being able to be called a human being ethics are as important It would be foolish to ask a man dying of starvation to satisfy his hunger by the values and ethics but at the same time we can't rob someone to meet our needs. There is a certain means to fill our bellies and that's what ethics tell us. If only food was important then why spend so much precious time and money teaching children the way of living life in society. A man devoid of ethics would be no different from animals I guess.|
|Rahul said: (Mar 19, 2013)|
|I want to say that Food comes first as compared to ethic because food is the survival human being if they do not eat food they will not survive, if they do not survive then ethic has no meaning.
For ex :- A beggar who have not enough money to eat food, he only pray the god to give me food to survive my life.
Ethic :- Ethic is for rich people who have some rule and regulation in his life. They enough food to survive his life.
IF THERE IS FOOD THEN ETHIC COMES, AND THERE IS NO FOOD THEN THERE IS NO ETHIC.
SO, FOOD COMES FIRST, AS ETHIC LATER.
|Raju said: (Nov 20, 2012)|
|As we are all known that, we are the most intelligent species in this earth, we should have certain manners to act with others in the society. Which shows that we are all bond with ethic in our day to day life. Moreover food is also mandatory as we know all.
So, what I say is both food and ethic are mandatory to lead a successful life. They are like side two sides of a same coin.
|Pooja said: (Oct 8, 2012)|
|Food and ethics are inter-related things. If a person is not getting enough food ethics are not going to help him out. But every time for getting food we should not forget the ethical values. There should be limit. Earn for your basic needs and not for comforts.
|Vijay Sharma said: (Oct 2, 2012)|
|I think it's tough to compare,
As child take birth from his birth he need food and ethic both to grow up himself,
If nobody won't gives him food he can't live.
And even if nobody won't takes care for him how can he live ?
SO FOOD AND ETHIC ARE TWO SIDE OF ONE COIN.
|Precious.Ego said: (Sep 1, 2012)|
|Good day pals, 'Food and Ethics which is more important', food I think. Well, thank God for freedom of expression and for this forum, I get to say my mind. Ethics are the principles of an individual which makes him/her what he is, while food is any substance which sustains and helps such individual stay alive & in good health to maintain his principles. "A hungry man is an angry (unprincipled in some situations) man" they say, but that doesn't mean that we should live to eat instead of eating to live. Anyways, the importance of both ( ethics and food) should not be overemphasized, for "what is life without a tiny bit of self respect or acknowledgment (mad), & what is self respect or principles without life or good health (?). In conclussion I'd say " give enough food to 100 armed robbers and I bet you, 50% of them are more ethical and would stick to doing an honest man's job". Thanks for reading.|
|Pintu said: (Jul 17, 2012)|
|We can't imagine ethics when we have no food to eat. In this globalized era, everyone want to survive and explore more and for this the basic entitlement is food, clothes and shelter.
Now, after fulfilling the basic needs we should think about ethics because man is a social animal and we belongs to the most intelligent entity of the world who are not only exist but proving that they are the best and it is only possible through coordination and cooperation between them.
|Ankit Tiwari said: (Jul 4, 2012)|
|This is purely a situation and people based discussion. Some of us learned it from childhood do forget our life for ethics. You can do an experiment yourself to know which is important. Be starved for one day and than ask the question to yourself.
So the people who lives on footpath, never try to teach them ethics. Give them food because if not given whom you will teach ethics if they would not survive of hunger.
|Aishwarya Nalluri said: (Apr 27, 2012)|
|According to me, both food and ethics are important but the priority changes according to the section of people we consider.
If a beggar has ethics and no money, its of no use.
If a rich person has a lot of money and no ethics, he is not worthy to live.
|Krunal said: (Apr 12, 2012)|
|Well Food & Ethics are 2 very different aspects of human life. Who says that by doing ethical things you won't get food in life. Ethics are the principles of individuals it inherits inside the person. A wise & ethical person will not go on wrong path like killing or stealing for the sake of food. So it all depends on individual's personality and how he is brought up. If you consider the case of criminals & terrorists they have adequate money to survive for entire life but they still continue on that unethical path as for them ethics don't exist. In short I would like to sum it up that Food & ethics are both important of life and which to choose between them all depends on an individual.|
|Karishma said: (Mar 12, 2012)|
|Both are on opposite side, but if we consider today's world, then we will realise that food comes first then ethics. It is because of corruption increases which automatically leads to increase in the inflation which directly affect the day-to-day life of a middle class society, who lives with minimum salary but with high expenses. So, if he thinks about ethics, then he will not able to fulfill the foody needs of his family or vice- versa. However, a rich or poor person has full of ethics in their lives, but if they will make starve for one day, then they will realise the importance of food.|
|Jpm Alon said: (Mar 4, 2012)|
|Its the talk of honest world not the corrupted one.
I am a respected person but now I don't have money to eat at instant. I ll not beg for money rather I ll leave as it is crying inside. Its all because I am bound in this type of society. Nobody wants to take initiation to change something.
With good suit I walk around a begger what is in my mind about the begger anybody can know this. See he is begging for food. And with this mind having no respect on human I give the speech of ethics and morality.
Food to hungry begger may come first priority but what if the same food is asked by little hungry kid?The hungry begger can't stand giving the food to the kid its the ethics.
It should be parallel but world has changed now.
|Lovey said: (Feb 16, 2012)|
|In my opinion I think that food and ethics both are important at their places.
Food is the daily need of people. But in todays era of corruption if someone is honest and earns his daily earning legally then he or she is considered mad in our society.
So its like if someone even tries to be ethical then the society does not encourage that.
And in my opinion this may be one of the reason that why our country is still underdeveloped.
Though food is important but that doesnt mean that we should acquire unethical methods to earn money and food.
Think if out of every 100 even 50 try to be ethical in life then our country can become a developed nation!
|Dii said: (Feb 6, 2012)|
|I agree for most of people food comes first. Food is nothing but a mans basic need it can be related to money. People go to any extent to get money. People cheat others so that they get some money, people pay bribe so that they get their work done, People murder, kidnap innocent people just for sake of Money (food).
Ethics is given least importance. There are people who try hard not to cheat anyone who want to do things morally right people around won't let that happen how much ever he tries to be ethical there are people who are always going to lead us into doing something against ethics somewhere or other. Hence its difficult for people to stick to ethics.
THus even if we don't want to give much importance to money people around are such that they will force us into doing evrything unethical.
|Swapna said: (Jan 16, 2012)|
|Yes, I do agree that for many a people Food is the priority over ethics.
Everybody wants to be honest in whatever field they go; but as the time passes by, there are a very few people left with the same ethics they had when they entered in that field.
That is because the strive to fulfill their hunger makes them to do so, and some people are just great trend follower.
for example- If a traffic constable challans a car for violating the traffic rules with proper receipt and amount, that amount will directly go to the govt. But instead, they take bribe any amount lesser than the original amount to fulfill their needs , although its unethical. And people support them equally to avoid rushing to courts.
So, somewhere their hunger is all unethical and above their ethics.
P.S- No offence. There obviously are some respectable people to whom their ethics matter a lot more than their hunger. RESPECT for them.
|Hemant Ganwani said: (Jan 11, 2012)|
|First of all I will be very thankful to whome give me a chance to present some view about the topics of food comes first, ethis later. So according to I think both things is imprtant in our life. And I think we should take both things at a time. And we can do it. And also we should coperate in some situation. If we are rich so there are no problem to take both things at a time, if we are not rich so by cooperating and managing we can take both things. Like if we have 100 rs for food. But in 60 rs we can take normal food so rest 40 rs rupees we shoud spend in ethics. Because God has given a imprtant time to do some good work. We should spend our life in good work because there are time for everybody.|
|Karuna Chavan said: (Dec 30, 2011)|
|Need of food and ethics are the two sides fo same coins. Both are essential for faithful existance of humanlife. When the person is equiped with all aminities, he should mustdeal with the etics first, for a beggar who is sick, mad and lost his conscise the food is first priorty. But for the sound man ethics are as important as food. Animals also eat food but the difference between man and animals are the great ethics.|
|Naveen Kotni said: (Dec 5, 2011)|
|It depends completely on the situatuion. Lets say If you have 10rs with you with that you can get normal food which fills your stomached and satisfies the appettite. Then you should not opt for a way to get a delicious food in an unethical way. If you dnt have even 10rs then you should beg for it as beggers do because beggin is not unethical.
There will never be a situation where you have to be unethical for getting the food. Our society is framed in such a manner.
Ethics goes first because there will never be a situation where you ve to be unethical in getting the adequate food.
|Bhavani said: (Oct 30, 2011)|
|As ethics says the person who is having anything which is more than enough should distribute that to everyone who all longing for that. If we follow this ethics there won't be any problem for food.
But before achieve that state of having enough thing, one's first preference will be to the food. This situation occurs only because of unethical hoardings.
So to me both food and ethics are important and both are inter related things. The preference given is purely depend on the People's status and character.
If you take a thief an beggar, their first preference is only to FOOD. For beggar, his second preference is ethics, so he is not a thief.
|Pooja said: (Oct 17, 2011)|
|Wen we talk of living a normal life in a civil society the importance of ethics and food cannot be compared. You cannot survive in a social environment without following a common set of ethical rules. I do agree with that. but here, as per the topic, when it comes to comparing the importance of food and ethics on a basic level, you have to have food as more important necessity. Ethics are important, but then it is confined to the ideal situation when you are leading a normal life in a civil society. You cannot keep on clinging to the ethical rules when all you need to survive is food, even if it comes by unethical ways. To sum up, I will say that, it is all about the priority. Unless you are in the situation when you have to choose between the two, you prefer ethics, but when it comes to the question of survival, you will obviously go for food..!!|
|Pankaj said: (Oct 13, 2011)|
|I am very thankful to the service provider to giving a chance to me to deliever my view about food comes first, etics later. I am supportive to food but not against ethics. Ethics plays an important role in shaping attitude of people. Nowadays it is very important in everyones life as they have to bear too much stres in the life. So they must frame rules and regulations based on their life how to tackle every problem. And to think and be in healthy condition one has to eat healthy. It can't be ruled out that one can think better, positive by having proper diet. But in limited manner. Having diet beyond the use results in strangulation of our body by laziness. So we should utilise both but in limited manner.|
|Swati said: (Oct 9, 2011)|
|Hi, according to me food comes first, because if a person is starving. What to say about the ethics, he can not even use his mind properly.
Food, clothing and shelter are the 'basic' needs of human life. And the word basic here itself speaks that it should come first.
And moreover according to the charles darwins theory -"SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST" substantiates that basic needs comes first.
|Kavita said: (Jul 9, 2011)|
|Everyone likes a person with ethics. Such idol people are praised but not followed. In today's world people can only enjoy the gandhidiri in "Lage raho munna bhai", but no one encultates the principles in themselves. Well this is human nature. The god, which has created human with the power to think, to difffer between good and bad, has also created 3 basic needs and food is one of them. When there is race for every thing, anyone would like to win only, and that is not possible by ethics only in today's world.|
|Ashad Raja said: (May 14, 2011)|
|Hi friends, As we all know food and ethics are like two side of a coin. I talk on ethic, to live the prosperous and respect life we need to follow certain rules in our life.
As everybody knows "roti, kapda and makan" are the basic need of the people to survive.
But according to me surviving is not called life. If you call surviving as life even insects, animals do survive. As we all are known as most intelligent species on this earth, so we should have certain manners to act with other in the society. Which shows that we all are bound with ethic in our day to day life.
|Nin said: (Apr 25, 2011)|
|It's difficult to choose between two fare things but I will support ethics. Ethics always says that we should distribute food equally amongst the society and should do the proper managment of it. Augmented with it, it says it should not be bring to home with improper ways so that it unbalances the society and will creat difficulties in future life. Some my colleagus said that, you will understand the hunger when you will starve for day but I want to clarify that even beggar earn his money with ethicsecome the he never try to steal things and so maintain the balance in society. But if you break the rule over food then it will solve the problem of one but become problem of many.|
|Soumya said: (Apr 18, 2011)|
|Noway. It is clear that food is everything in our day to day life. Also I support "ethics". It has some role in a human being's life. But not so much important as food.
If there is food then there is life. If there is life than there is ethics.
So we can conclude that.
"FOOD MAKES ETHICS. ETHICS ONLY SUPPORT IT".
|Harish... said: (Feb 18, 2011)|
|As far I considered the ethics must come first and then food, being a ethical person in society represents your character. Today's world is moving with tremendous rate and in this moving world we forget our responsibilities and we simply doing anything for food even we taking the life of others for feeding mouth. There are many examples which I can tell you like naxalist , even we normal people can reach the height of egregious for food.
At last I only say that if you can't make your own food then you should not have authority to play with ethics. If ethics is there then only the world's can run.
|Chandrika said: (Feb 17, 2011)|
|I support that food comes first.Even a highly educated person who follows ethics may not follow ethics when he is under hunger.Hunger can make a thief to good at the same time it can make a good person as a thief.Its the capacity of food
If you say ethics to a hungry person he may think you as fool.but give him food and even if you say two words he may be inspired to follow ethics.
|Veni said: (Feb 13, 2011)|
|I agree with Nandana. Because t situation decides t importance of anyone. One who is starving food alone knows about t importance of it. Once you have t basic needs, you start following t ethics.|
|Jaikishan said: (Feb 1, 2011)|
|In my view, no doubt, food is the basic necessity of life. But in some circumstances or in some relationship, ethics comes first. Take example of a poor family who consist of a mother and her small child. They both are hungry. But they have the meal for a single person only. Now what will the mother do? she will give this food to his child first. And in my view, ethics is the only thing that make different one person from another. And specially now-a-days, when everyone want to rise. And you will get this opportunity if you have ethics. This does not mean, I am against food. But we cannot rate among them if both are present simultaneously in a circumstance. In a situation, where a person has to choose between food and ethics, it depends on his personality, his mindset and his priorities.|
|Alok Mazumdar said: (Jan 31, 2011)|
|The way we think, the same way we present ourself. If gandhiji had not given importance to ethics, we might not have got freedom. It's all depends upon the circumstances prevailing in our life. No doubt food comes first, but to lead a meaningful and respectful life ethics are also important. They must go hand in hand. If a human is made to starve for a day, obiouslly he comes to the importance of food. And due to the high moral values of our great leaders, India has gots its freedom.|
|Mukesh Kumar said: (Jan 28, 2011)|
|We are discussing about what we will opt when comes to food or ethics, if we give priority to food that means we may compromise with our principles that may led to become habitual of opting things on the basis of only fullfilling our requrements and inshort, gradually it may total degradation of the humanity. I think we are discussing it so that we can apply it on our real time scenario otherwise our view will be futile so I want to suggest people to think twice that where are you getting your food if it will unethical then I know most of us will choose to be hungry. In our real time scenario food willl be easily avalable to at least survive but whena comes to ethical issue I think it is our assets which we are continously collecting through our whole life journey and believe me it really MATTERS, so never compromise.|
|Ankit said: (Jan 20, 2011)|
|yes i agree with all but food come first because it the basic requirement of the human being but is ethics is secondary thing in the life of human being ,it is also necessary in the today's world for com-petting with other's.SO,the conclusion is based that food is primary necessary of any human being to live and ethics is the secondary item to earn the money and get food for the family,cliges etc|
|Sunaina said: (Dec 2, 2010)|
|I agree with you Nandana. A Person who is very rich but without any ethical values, He is never recognized or respected. A person is recognized with his ethics. Just consider in the world, we Indians are popular for our ethical values n culture, more than anything else. Ethics add value to anything, be it a person or a country.|
|@Tul Verma said: (Nov 14, 2010)|
|All the person who are in the side of food, I would like to make you remember, that all the alive being instead human, he lives for other need, and without this philosophy, there is no existence of life and society. Food is necessary but we can never survive without ethics, eg. terrorism is not a concrete problem, it is a thought, we can't solve it by capital punishment.|
|Mrinmaya said: (Sep 9, 2010)|
|Hi, friends it is not very easy to say weather food comes first or ethics. Sometimes such a situation arises in front of us that we can not give up our ethics for the sake of our belly. We commonly hear that leaders are starving for the demand to be fulfilled, why they do so, there is no personal cause only for the betterment of society. So, in this case we can say ethics first, food later.|
|Deepak said: (Aug 24, 2010)|
|Hi, no doubt food is the basic need for survival. But to live a respectful life ethics are must.. food and ethics must go hand in hand for leading a good life.
Though importance of food is more but then you cann't even ignore the ethics. Rest all depends upon the person thinking..
|Divya Bhatnagar said: (Aug 18, 2010)|
|Hi! friends, I'm totally agree with you all...
As we all are aware about the fact that food is the basic source of energy in life, without having food, we can not respond to the things in are practical and stressful life, ethics have their importance after food.. as with food only we get the power to perform any task in life....
|Nandana said: (Aug 17, 2010)|
|Friends, we cannot say which is important because the priority given to ethics or food declares the personality of a human being.
A person who gives importance to ethics not for food becomes great person eg: gandhiji, harichandra etc., if gandhiji had gave importance to food he did not becomes a leader he simply become a lawyer and does his practice. similarly if Satya Harichandra does not given importance to ethics he did not become poor.
The people who gives importance to ethics when they are happy and gives importance to food when they are in need becomes a common man or ordinary man.
The people who gives importance to food not for the ethics becomes thieves and creates problem to the society .
|Mukta Chatterjee said: (Aug 15, 2010)|
|Hi,Yes both are necessary but not at cost of others life. I agree with shiv that there are naxals who do this same thing. Even other internal terrorist groups who kills others only to serve themselves. This is not done we cannot have food by Hook or crook. The main reason behind it is poverty so, what I feel that government should take corrective measures against them.|
|Ramki said: (Aug 15, 2010)|
|Hi, ethics are important but after getting food. Because, without food not up to the ethics even human being can't survive.|
|Rahul said: (Aug 9, 2010)|
|Hi ,i believe both are necessary at their places as you can't eat your ethics and vice versa e.g a beggar who want food for his survival cant think of ethics and stop begging just because his ethics don't allow this as no one become beggar from his own choice likewise for a respectful living in society you put your ethics first to have food and other basic necessities.|
|Rajesh said: (Aug 9, 2010)|
|My point is food is the primary need of all living things in the world. So the first priority should for the food, no one can become a philosopher without having good nutrition in the life...|
|Shiv said: (Aug 9, 2010)|
|For sure food come first of all ethics. All creatures are engineered to do almost for survival. People does not hesitate to sell off their own kids for food. So it is unwise to say that ethics come first. There may be few who give priority to ethics than food. Anyway this universe is full of exceptional cases. But here we are discussing about normal peoples. Miss Neha have a very good point but a person can be a patriotic only and only when he is well fed and well educated . For a poor person there is no differance. Naxals are the best examples of this fact. They doesn't bother to kill their own countrymen just for money only. Do you think that naxalism is a war of idealogy? It is just a war of hunger. They poor people even doesn't know what is naxalism is all about. They are simple being targeted by neibour countries, who wants to encash this food fact for distablising india.|
|Josh said: (Aug 7, 2010)|
|Food and etthics are same in one perspective. If ethics are dissolved, survival of a person is useless. If food is not there, survival doesn't exist, beside agreeing the fact food is 1st, ethics are next.|
|Jamila said: (Aug 7, 2010)|
|Its true that food comes first , ethics later.
After satisfying the basic necessity of life only one can be ethical.
|Viveck Saini said: (Aug 7, 2010)|
|No doubt in above lines that "FOOD COMES FIRST, ETHICS LATER"
You cant imagine a life without food whereas one can survive without proper shelter and clothing, i agree with vasanth that "In yearly ages like stone age man searched for food first"
Ethics are also important but not more than food in any way.
|Vasanth said: (Aug 5, 2010)|
|In yearly ages like stone age man searched for food first. Then he started to develop his civilization like clothes shellter and all those things so food is first for my opinion.|
|Padma said: (Aug 4, 2010)|
|This statement is really a true one because we can't survive without food. Ethics is also important for human life but until or unless we need food to follow our ethics.|
|Bharath said: (Aug 2, 2010)|
|I agree with Shanmu and Swapnika said, ethics are for showing the path to the people for easy achievement of their goals and living in manner, but without taking food we cannot survive...|
|Siri said: (Jul 30, 2010)|
|Of course ethics are most precious to live as a good citizen, but firstly to survive or to live itself we need the food, without survival of human being, how can they follow ethics, even though ethics are important but only after food.|
|Ani said: (Jul 29, 2010)|
|Ethics are the most precious to us to live as good citizen in the society.if you follow the ethics then you can recognized by the persons which are living in the society or from our our family members also.|
|Ani said: (Jul 29, 2010)|
|Yes friends food comes first later on we concentrating ethics and the remaining, because with out food how far we can stay on the earth. This is not a meaning that taking food at the every movement.|
Food Comes First, Ethics Later
Email : (optional)
» Your comments will be displayed only after manual approval.